Search Results

Showing 1 - 20 results of 30 for search '"List A"', query time: 1.37s Refine Results
  1. 1
    “.... Mecklenburg, unpubl. data). Depth: 37–143 m (121–469 ft) (Panchenko et al. 2016). Panchenko et al. (2016) list...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  2. 2
    “...; depth: about 216–985 m (708–3,231 ft) (Dolganov and Saveliev 2013). Panchenko et al. (2016) list a...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  3. 3
    “.... 2011). Eschmeyer and Herald also list a questionable record from San Pedro, southern California. Depth...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  4. 4
    “....: Mecklenburg et al. 2016; max.: Kim and Kim 2019). Panchenko et al. (2016) list a maximum depth of 280 m (918...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  5. 5
    “.... 2011). Eschmeyer and Herald also list a questionable record from San Pedro, southern California. Depth...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  6. 6
    “.... 2011). Eschmeyer and Herald also list a questionable record from San Pedro, southern California. Depth...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  7. 7
    “...; depth: about 216–985 m (708–3,231 ft) (Dolganov and Saveliev 2013). Panchenko et al. (2016) list a...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  8. 8
    “...; depth: about 216–985 m (708–3,231 ft) (Dolganov and Saveliev 2013). Panchenko et al. (2016) list a...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  9. 9
    “.... Mecklenburg, unpubl. data). Depth: 37–143 m (121–469 ft) (Panchenko et al. 2016). Panchenko et al. (2016) list...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  10. 10
    “.... Mecklenburg, unpubl. data). Depth: 37–143 m (121–469 ft) (Panchenko et al. 2016). Panchenko et al. (2016) list...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  11. 11
    “....: Mecklenburg et al. 2016; max.: Kim and Kim 2019). Panchenko et al. (2016) list a maximum depth of 280 m (918...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  12. 12
    “....: Mecklenburg et al. 2016; max.: Kim and Kim 2019). Panchenko et al. (2016) list a maximum depth of 280 m (918...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  13. 13
    “...–585 m (171– 1,919 ft) (DFO). The NWFSC-FRAM database lists a much deeper record— 1,073 m (3,519 ft...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  14. 14
    “... Collection lists a capture of this species in a midwater trawl fished at greater than 3,000 m (9,840 ft...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  15. 15
    “...–585 m (171– 1,919 ft) (DFO). The NWFSC-FRAM database lists a much deeper record— 1,073 m (3,519 ft...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  16. 16
    “...–585 m (171– 1,919 ft) (DFO). The NWFSC-FRAM database lists a much deeper record— 1,073 m (3,519 ft...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Text
  17. 17
    “...). The DFO database lists a number of specimens much larger than 15.2 cm (e.g., 23 cm, 9.1 in, 20 cm, 7.9...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  18. 18
    “.... Unpublished data from their trawl surveys; max. NWFSC-FRAM). The NWFSC-FRAM database also lists a single, much...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  19. 19
    “..., lists a capture in a bottom trawl net of this species at a depth of 728 m (1,738 ft), much deeper than...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
  20. 20
    “.... to M.L.). We note that the DFO database lists a number of specimens much larger than 18 cm (e.g., 29 cm...”
    Get access
    Get access
    Other/Unknown Material
Search Tools: Get RSS Feed