Figure 5 from: Thiel R, Knebelsberger T (2016) How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods. ZooKeys 617: 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866

Figure 5 - NJ dendrogram based on K2P pairwise genetic distances. Values at nodes indicate the result of the bootstrap test (10.000 pseudo replicates). Only values ≥ 50 are shown. For Ammodytes tobianus (grey box) and Hyperoplus lanceolatus all analysed individuals are shown. In case of Ammodytes ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thiel, Ralf, Knebelsberger, Thomas
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Animalia
Chordata
Actinopterygii
Perciformes
Ammodytidae
Ammodytes
Ammodytes tobianusAnimalia
Gymnammodytes
Gymnammodytes cicerelusAnimalia
Hyperoplus
Hyperoplus lanceolatusAnimalia
Ammodytes marinusAnimalia
Hyperoplus immaculatus
COI
DNA barcoding
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
Hyperoplus lanceolatus
Northeast Atlantic
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/981577
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866.figure5
Description
Summary:Figure 5 - NJ dendrogram based on K2P pairwise genetic distances. Values at nodes indicate the result of the bootstrap test (10.000 pseudo replicates). Only values ≥ 50 are shown. For Ammodytes tobianus (grey box) and Hyperoplus lanceolatus all analysed individuals are shown. In case of Ammodytes marinus and Hyperoplus immaculatus the number of specimens is given in brackets.

Similar Items