Zur Markierung von Numerus an Nomina in den samojedischen Sprachen – Synchronie und mögliche Implikationen für die Rekonstruktion des Protosamojedischen und des Protouralischen
This article “On the indication of nominal number in the Samoyedic languages – Synchrony and possible implications for the reconstruction of Proto-Samoyedic and Proto- Uralic” has got two major aims: on the one hand, it tries to systemize and analyze the complex nominal number marking in the present...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | German |
Published: |
Zenodo
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7997905 |
Summary: | This article “On the indication of nominal number in the Samoyedic languages – Synchrony and possible implications for the reconstruction of Proto-Samoyedic and Proto- Uralic” has got two major aims: on the one hand, it tries to systemize and analyze the complex nominal number marking in the present-day Samoyedic languages (chapter 2). On the other hand, some conclusions from this for the reconstruction of nominal number marking in Proto-Samoyedic (chapter 3) and Proto-Uralic (chapter 4) are drawn. The major outcome of this research is that especially the Northern Samoyedic languages Nganasan, Enets and Nenets are particularly conservative in terms of nominal number marking and are hence to be regarded as key languages for the reconstruction of both Proto-Samoyedic and Proto-Uralic in this respect. |
---|