Deliverable 4.2: Report on recommendations on fragility functions for buildings and infrastructure components to be used in rapid response context

This deliverable reports an exhaustive state-of-the-art compilation of the most representative seismic fragility and loss estimation models for the buildings and infrastructure components in the testbeds (TBs in the following) of the TURNkey project, which are: TB1-Bucharest (Romania), TB2-Pyrenees...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandru Tiganescu, Ali G. Ozcebe, Alireza Kharazian, Antonella Di Meo, Antonino Famà, Atefe Darzi, Barbara Borzi, Benedikt Halldórsson, Bjarni Bessason, Caterina Negulescu, Dina D'Ayala, Dragos Toma-Danila, Francesca Bozzoni, Georgia Giannaraki, Li Sun, Mandy Korff, Mario Martinelli, Marta Faravelli, Nikolaos Melis, Pierre Gehl, Rosemary Fayjaloun, Sergio Molina Palacios, Stefan Florin Balan
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/7442433
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7442433
Description
Summary:This deliverable reports an exhaustive state-of-the-art compilation of the most representative seismic fragility and loss estimation models for the buildings and infrastructure components in the testbeds (TBs in the following) of the TURNkey project, which are: TB1-Bucharest (Romania), TB2-Pyrenees (France), TB3-Hveragerði (Southern Iceland) and Húsavík (Northern Iceland), TB4-Patras and Aegio area (Greece), TB5-Port of Gioia Tauro (Italy), and TB6- Groningen (Netherlands). This activity is included within the Work Package 4, aimed at developing and harmonizing seismic physical vulnerability and loss estimation models for structures and infrastructure components within a rapid loss prediction framework. Within a broader context, it may be stated that the contents of this deliverable may also be extrapolated as a useful synthesis of the structural vulnerability standing for the entire European territory. In the chapter 2 of the document, a detailed list of the fragility and loss estimation models adopted for building taxonomies and infrastructure components is tabulated together with their associated publication/reference and a brief description of the corresponding work. Then, futher important information is syntesized in terms of type, structural typology, intensity measure, damage scale, and the region of applicability referring to each individual fragility/loss model under consideration. In chapter 3, in-depth information and discussion of the vulnerability and loss estimation models presented in Chapter 2 are provided for each TB. Furthermore, background exposure information is also provided. Finally, chapter 4 presents the conclusive summary of the Deliverable.