Ceratopera axi (Riedl, 1954) Den Hartog 1964

Ceratopera axi (Riedl, 1954) Den Hartog, 1964 (Figs. 11 D–11E) syn. Proxenetes axi Riedl, 1954 syn. Ceratopera bifida Ehlers & Ax, 1974 New locality. Playa Cerro Chato, Parque Nacional de Santa Teresa, Departamento de Rocha, Uruguay (33°59’6.34”S, 53°31’48.99”W). Between algae (mostly filiform b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steenkiste, Niels Van, Volonterio, Odile, Schockaert, Ernest, Artois, Tom
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6230433
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/443987C2BB262679FF4D2C886A94FBF3
Description
Summary:Ceratopera axi (Riedl, 1954) Den Hartog, 1964 (Figs. 11 D–11E) syn. Proxenetes axi Riedl, 1954 syn. Ceratopera bifida Ehlers & Ax, 1974 New locality. Playa Cerro Chato, Parque Nacional de Santa Teresa, Departamento de Rocha, Uruguay (33°59’6.34”S, 53°31’48.99”W). Between algae (mostly filiform brown algae) on exposed rocks, between small brown algae on top of very flat, isolated rocks, partly embedded in sand (20/07/2004). Known distribution. Gulf of Napels and Sicily (Riedl 1954); Galapagos Islands (Ehlers & Ax 1974); Falkland Islands and California (Karling 1986); Weddell Sea and La Réunion (Artois et al. 2000), New South Wales, Australia (Willems et al. 2004); Kerguelen (Willems et al. 2005a); New Caledonia (Willems et al. 2005b). Material. Observations on a live specimen. Two whole mounts. Discussion. The stylets of the Uruguayan specimens measure 86–90 μm, when measured axially and the bursal appendage is 56–64 μm long. Both structures, especially the stylet, are small compared to known measurements of this species: stylet between 70–180 μm, bursal appendage between 67–117 μm (see Willems et al. 2004, table 1; Willems et al. 2005a, b). Only in the specimens of the Galapagos Islands (Ehlers & Ax 1974), is the bursal appendage also less than 70 μm. Because the variation in the size of the stylet is relatively large, it is possible that we are dealing with a species complex (see Willems et al. 2005a, b). However, this should be examined in the future by a thorough morphological (and molecular) analysis. Published as part of Steenkiste, Niels Van, Volonterio, Odile, Schockaert, Ernest & Artois, Tom, 2008, Marine Rhabdocoela (Platyhelminthes, Rhabditophora) from Uruguay, with the description of eight new species and two new genera, pp. 1-33 in Zootaxa 1914 on page 29, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.184571