Schaefferia czernovi

Schaefferia czernovi (Martynova, 1978) Figs 3, 9, 11 Ceratophysella czernovi Martynova, 1978: 37 Type-locality: Tareya, Taimyr Peninsula, Russia Material studied. Northeastern Europe: Kolguev Isl. (two specimens); Dolgii Isl. (14 specimens); Bolvanskaya Guba bay (37 specimens); Pakhancheskaya Guba b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Babenko, Anatoly
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zenodo.org/record/5929436
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5929436
Description
Summary:Schaefferia czernovi (Martynova, 1978) Figs 3, 9, 11 Ceratophysella czernovi Martynova, 1978: 37 Type-locality: Tareya, Taimyr Peninsula, Russia Material studied. Northeastern Europe: Kolguev Isl. (two specimens); Dolgii Isl. (14 specimens); Bolvanskaya Guba bay (37 specimens); Pakhancheskaya Guba bay (35 specimens); Khaipudyrskaya Guba bay (two specimens); Waigach Island (two specimens); Komi Republic (four specimens); Southern island of Novaya Zemlya Archipelago (56 specimens). Siberia: Yamal Peninsula (seven specimens); Taimyr Peninsula (69 specimens), Putorana Plateau (13 specimens); Yenisei basin, Mirnoe [60° 20’ N] (two specimens). Deposited in the author’s collection. Remarks. The absence of labial papilla C (Fig. 3) together with almost complete chaetotaxy of A - type permits to identify this species easily. As in S. bermani sp. nov. most of dorsal chaetae in S. czernovi are rather stout due to hyaline “cover” although this character appears to vary in regional populations. Mainly the species’ chaetotaxy is stable, with only the frequent absence of a 1 on one or both sides of Abd.4 (in other specimens these chaetae are widely separated) and the occasional absence of microchaeta p 3 on the same tergum (asymmetrically as a rule) (Fig. 9) observed. There is only one exception to the morphological homogeneity of S. czernovi; that is in several cave populations in Middle Ural Mountains. Most of the adult specimens collected in this region are characterised by the absence of a 2’ chaetae on Abd.1–3 as well as some of m -chaetae on the same terga, chaetae p 3 on Abd.4 is also usually absent. Formally they could be described as a new species because a 2’ chaetae (= m 2 in Thibaud et al. 2004 & Jordana et al. 2012) are present on Abd. 1–3 in all known congeners with 5+5 ocelli. One slightly more intensively coloured specimen (probably inhabiting upper part of the cave), collected at the same date together with several abnormal specimens, has the same chaetotaxy as true northern S. czernovi. Therefore, I ...