Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
Humans play an integral role in biological invasions, from aiding introductions of alien species to experiencing their impacts and holding the ability to manage them. The importance of understanding the dynamics of stakeholders' perceptions on alien species is therefore increasingly recognized....
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200 |
_version_ | 1821551285533409280 |
---|---|
author | Henke, Theresa Novoa, Ana Bárðarson, Hlynur Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta |
author_facet | Henke, Theresa Novoa, Ana Bárðarson, Hlynur Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta |
author_sort | Henke, Theresa |
collection | Zenodo |
description | Humans play an integral role in biological invasions, from aiding introductions of alien species to experiencing their impacts and holding the ability to manage them. The importance of understanding the dynamics of stakeholders' perceptions on alien species is therefore increasingly recognized. In this study, we used anonymous online surveys to contrast recreational anglers' perceptions towards European flounder ( Platichthys flesus , Linnaeus, 1758) in Iceland, where it is classified as a potentially invasive species, to the perceptions prevailing amongst recreational anglers in the species' native range. We furthermore explored potential temporal changes in the perception of Icelandic recreational anglers. Our results indicate that Icelandic recreational anglers have a highly negative perception towards the European flounder, while in its native range, recreational anglers have positive perceptions towards this species. In Iceland, we have furthermore detected a significant change towards less negative perceptions between the surveys administered in October 2019 and March 2023. Finally, we compared the results of the online surveys and novel, conservation culturomics tools to further explore stakeholder perceptions and public interest in Iceland. The comparison highlighted some limitations that should be considered when using culturomics in very small societies or for small languages. For example, the text mining approaches on newspaper articles and social media conservations detected neutral perceptions in the communication to the public and within the targeted stakeholder group via social media in contrary to the perceptions detected in the online surveys. Moreover, we detected short-term peaks in the public's interest in European flounder and potential drivers of those peaks using Wikipedia pageviews but Google Trends provided mixed and unreproducible results. Overall, our study highlights that stakeholders' perceptions towards an alien species as well as the public's interest in it vary over time and ... |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Iceland |
genre_facet | Iceland |
id | ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11420200 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | unknown |
op_collection_id | ftzenodo |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.11720010.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl510.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl610.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl210.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl110.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl310.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl410.1111/2041-21 |
op_relation | https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl5 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl6 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl2 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl1 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl3 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl4 https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12844 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30339-y https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2014.5.1.01 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.2023088 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123318 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.03.004 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09910 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0552-y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0767-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13 https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12379 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03367.x https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2020.15.4.08 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13707 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116374 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.09.015 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13404 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.42.31017 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846452 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152802 https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1592-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.059 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52787 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09699-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1174983 https://doi.org/10.5120/13851-1685 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937900770531 |
op_rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode |
op_source | NeoBiota, 93, 117-141, (2024-05-31) |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11420200 2025-01-16T22:34:31+00:00 Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space Henke, Theresa Novoa, Ana Bárðarson, Hlynur Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta 2024-05-31 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl5 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl6 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl2 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl1 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl3 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl4 https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12844 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30339-y https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2014.5.1.01 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.2023088 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123318 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.03.004 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09910 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0552-y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0767-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13 https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12379 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03367.x https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2020.15.4.08 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13707 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116374 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.09.015 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13404 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.42.31017 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846452 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152802 https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1592-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.059 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52787 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09699-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1174983 https://doi.org/10.5120/13851-1685 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937900770531 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode NeoBiota, 93, 117-141, (2024-05-31) Angling community biological invasions communication and outreach conservation culturomics culturomics digital data European flounder Platichthys flesus recreational angling community stakeholder perceptions surveys info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2024 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.11720010.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl510.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl610.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl210.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl110.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl310.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl410.1111/2041-21 2024-07-25T15:51:05Z Humans play an integral role in biological invasions, from aiding introductions of alien species to experiencing their impacts and holding the ability to manage them. The importance of understanding the dynamics of stakeholders' perceptions on alien species is therefore increasingly recognized. In this study, we used anonymous online surveys to contrast recreational anglers' perceptions towards European flounder ( Platichthys flesus , Linnaeus, 1758) in Iceland, where it is classified as a potentially invasive species, to the perceptions prevailing amongst recreational anglers in the species' native range. We furthermore explored potential temporal changes in the perception of Icelandic recreational anglers. Our results indicate that Icelandic recreational anglers have a highly negative perception towards the European flounder, while in its native range, recreational anglers have positive perceptions towards this species. In Iceland, we have furthermore detected a significant change towards less negative perceptions between the surveys administered in October 2019 and March 2023. Finally, we compared the results of the online surveys and novel, conservation culturomics tools to further explore stakeholder perceptions and public interest in Iceland. The comparison highlighted some limitations that should be considered when using culturomics in very small societies or for small languages. For example, the text mining approaches on newspaper articles and social media conservations detected neutral perceptions in the communication to the public and within the targeted stakeholder group via social media in contrary to the perceptions detected in the online surveys. Moreover, we detected short-term peaks in the public's interest in European flounder and potential drivers of those peaks using Wikipedia pageviews but Google Trends provided mixed and unreproducible results. Overall, our study highlights that stakeholders' perceptions towards an alien species as well as the public's interest in it vary over time and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Zenodo |
spellingShingle | Angling community biological invasions communication and outreach conservation culturomics culturomics digital data European flounder Platichthys flesus recreational angling community stakeholder perceptions surveys Henke, Theresa Novoa, Ana Bárðarson, Hlynur Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
title | Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
title_full | Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
title_fullStr | Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
title_full_unstemmed | Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
title_short | Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
title_sort | let's talk aliens - stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space |
topic | Angling community biological invasions communication and outreach conservation culturomics culturomics digital data European flounder Platichthys flesus recreational angling community stakeholder perceptions surveys |
topic_facet | Angling community biological invasions communication and outreach conservation culturomics culturomics digital data European flounder Platichthys flesus recreational angling community stakeholder perceptions surveys |
url | https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200 |