Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space

Humans play an integral role in biological invasions, from aiding introductions of alien species to experiencing their impacts and holding the ability to manage them. The importance of understanding the dynamics of stakeholders' perceptions on alien species is therefore increasingly recognized....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henke, Theresa, Novoa, Ana, Bárðarson, Hlynur, Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200
_version_ 1821551285533409280
author Henke, Theresa
Novoa, Ana
Bárðarson, Hlynur
Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta
author_facet Henke, Theresa
Novoa, Ana
Bárðarson, Hlynur
Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta
author_sort Henke, Theresa
collection Zenodo
description Humans play an integral role in biological invasions, from aiding introductions of alien species to experiencing their impacts and holding the ability to manage them. The importance of understanding the dynamics of stakeholders' perceptions on alien species is therefore increasingly recognized. In this study, we used anonymous online surveys to contrast recreational anglers' perceptions towards European flounder ( Platichthys flesus , Linnaeus, 1758) in Iceland, where it is classified as a potentially invasive species, to the perceptions prevailing amongst recreational anglers in the species' native range. We furthermore explored potential temporal changes in the perception of Icelandic recreational anglers. Our results indicate that Icelandic recreational anglers have a highly negative perception towards the European flounder, while in its native range, recreational anglers have positive perceptions towards this species. In Iceland, we have furthermore detected a significant change towards less negative perceptions between the surveys administered in October 2019 and March 2023. Finally, we compared the results of the online surveys and novel, conservation culturomics tools to further explore stakeholder perceptions and public interest in Iceland. The comparison highlighted some limitations that should be considered when using culturomics in very small societies or for small languages. For example, the text mining approaches on newspaper articles and social media conservations detected neutral perceptions in the communication to the public and within the targeted stakeholder group via social media in contrary to the perceptions detected in the online surveys. Moreover, we detected short-term peaks in the public's interest in European flounder and potential drivers of those peaks using Wikipedia pageviews but Google Trends provided mixed and unreproducible results. Overall, our study highlights that stakeholders' perceptions towards an alien species as well as the public's interest in it vary over time and ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11420200
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftzenodo
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.11720010.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl510.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl610.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl210.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl110.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl310.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl410.1111/2041-21
op_relation https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl5
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl6
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl2
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl1
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl3
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl4
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12844
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30339-y
https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2014.5.1.01
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.2023088
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123318
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13706
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.03.004
https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09910
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0552-y
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.026
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0767-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12379
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03367.x
https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2020.15.4.08
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13707
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2598
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116374
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.09.015
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13404
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.42.31017
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846452
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152802
https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1592-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.059
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52787
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09699-7
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq048
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.041
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1174983
https://doi.org/10.5120/13851-1685
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937900770531
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_source NeoBiota, 93, 117-141, (2024-05-31)
publishDate 2024
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format openpolar
spelling ftzenodo:oai:zenodo.org:11420200 2025-01-16T22:34:31+00:00 Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space Henke, Theresa Novoa, Ana Bárðarson, Hlynur Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta 2024-05-31 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200 unknown Pensoft Publishers https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl5 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl6 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl2 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl1 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl3 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl4 https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12844 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30339-y https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2014.5.1.01 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.2023088 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123318 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.03.004 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09910 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i05 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0552-y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0767-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.003 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13 https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12379 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03367.x https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2020.15.4.08 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7430692 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13707 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116374 https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.09.015 https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13404 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.42.31017 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846452 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152802 https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1592-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.059 https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.62.52787 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-022-09699-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.045 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1174983 https://doi.org/10.5120/13851-1685 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222937900770531 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode NeoBiota, 93, 117-141, (2024-05-31) Angling community biological invasions communication and outreach conservation culturomics culturomics digital data European flounder Platichthys flesus recreational angling community stakeholder perceptions surveys info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2024 ftzenodo https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.11720010.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl510.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl610.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl210.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl110.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl310.3897/neobiota.93.117200.suppl410.1111/2041-21 2024-07-25T15:51:05Z Humans play an integral role in biological invasions, from aiding introductions of alien species to experiencing their impacts and holding the ability to manage them. The importance of understanding the dynamics of stakeholders' perceptions on alien species is therefore increasingly recognized. In this study, we used anonymous online surveys to contrast recreational anglers' perceptions towards European flounder ( Platichthys flesus , Linnaeus, 1758) in Iceland, where it is classified as a potentially invasive species, to the perceptions prevailing amongst recreational anglers in the species' native range. We furthermore explored potential temporal changes in the perception of Icelandic recreational anglers. Our results indicate that Icelandic recreational anglers have a highly negative perception towards the European flounder, while in its native range, recreational anglers have positive perceptions towards this species. In Iceland, we have furthermore detected a significant change towards less negative perceptions between the surveys administered in October 2019 and March 2023. Finally, we compared the results of the online surveys and novel, conservation culturomics tools to further explore stakeholder perceptions and public interest in Iceland. The comparison highlighted some limitations that should be considered when using culturomics in very small societies or for small languages. For example, the text mining approaches on newspaper articles and social media conservations detected neutral perceptions in the communication to the public and within the targeted stakeholder group via social media in contrary to the perceptions detected in the online surveys. Moreover, we detected short-term peaks in the public's interest in European flounder and potential drivers of those peaks using Wikipedia pageviews but Google Trends provided mixed and unreproducible results. Overall, our study highlights that stakeholders' perceptions towards an alien species as well as the public's interest in it vary over time and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Zenodo
spellingShingle Angling community
biological invasions
communication and outreach
conservation culturomics
culturomics
digital data
European flounder
Platichthys flesus
recreational angling community
stakeholder perceptions
surveys
Henke, Theresa
Novoa, Ana
Bárðarson, Hlynur
Ólafsdóttir, Guðbjörg Ásta
Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
title Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
title_full Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
title_fullStr Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
title_full_unstemmed Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
title_short Let's talk aliens - Stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
title_sort let's talk aliens - stakeholder perceptions of an alien species differ in time and space
topic Angling community
biological invasions
communication and outreach
conservation culturomics
culturomics
digital data
European flounder
Platichthys flesus
recreational angling community
stakeholder perceptions
surveys
topic_facet Angling community
biological invasions
communication and outreach
conservation culturomics
culturomics
digital data
European flounder
Platichthys flesus
recreational angling community
stakeholder perceptions
surveys
url https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.93.117200