Amathillopsis charlottae Coleman 1998

Amathillopsis cf. charlottae Coleman, 1998 Figs 9–10 Type locality . Antarctic Peninsula, 66°33.10'S 68°41.90'W, depth 607 m, Polarstern cruise 42 ANT XIV/2, station 177, Agassiz-Trawl. Material examined . NIWA 84392 (figured) and NIWA 156317 (3 specimens), Canterbury Basin, east of South...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lörz, Anne-Nina, Peart, Rachael A.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Zenodo 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10413668
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D3B2B7E471B8706FF394A5E496A55FB
Description
Summary:Amathillopsis cf. charlottae Coleman, 1998 Figs 9–10 Type locality . Antarctic Peninsula, 66°33.10'S 68°41.90'W, depth 607 m, Polarstern cruise 42 ANT XIV/2, station 177, Agassiz-Trawl. Material examined . NIWA 84392 (figured) and NIWA 156317 (3 specimens), Canterbury Basin, east of South Island, New Zealand, 45.872°S 174.082°E, 1676 m, NZOI station S152, 26 October 1979. Diagnosis . (Based on Coleman, 1998). Head with short rostrum, anteroventral angle deeply excavate, ocular lobe with short acute process, with ridge parallel to ventral margin; Pereonite 1 somewhat longer than 2 and 3. Pereonite 2–4 indistinctly keeled dorsally; pereonite 5 with short carina and 5 or 6 with long pointed, weakly posteriorly curved processes. Similar but slightly longer processes on pleonites 1–2 and a shorter one on pleonite 3, about half length of that on pleonite 2. Epimeral plate 1 ventrally truncate, obtuse posteroventrally; plate 2 posteroventrally acute, plates 1 and 2 laterally ridged; posterolateral margin of epimeral plate 3 sinuous, posteroventral angle acute. Urosomite 1 as long as segment 2 and 3 combined; urosomite 2 shortest; urosomite 3 with shallow keel, slightly overreaching posterior margin, with shallow depression in lateral view. Distribution . Southern Canterbury basin, New Zealand, Antarctic Peninsula. Remarks . While analysing the Amathillopsidae held in the NIWA collection, we encountered specimens collected off southeast New Zealand that were remarkably similar to A. charlottae , originally described by Coleman (1998) from the Weddell Sea. While Coleman (1998) stated that A. charlottae had no eyes “or pigments lost in alcohol”, the New Zealand material shows distinct small, round eyes. The lateral surface of the New Zealand material seems smoother than Coleman’s Antarctic material. The morphological differences between the New Zealand and the Weddell Sea specimens were too minute to establish a new species, and our attempts to secure DNA sequences failed. We therefore refer to the New Zealand specimens ...