From Consultation to Reconciliation: Aboriginal Rights and the Crown’s Duty to Consult
The judiciary has repeatedly called on First Nations and the Crown not to tax the institutional competence of the judiciary by excessive litigation of disputes, and instead to attempt to reach negotiated settlements . It has also held that the Crown is under a duty to consult with a First Nation whe...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Osgoode Digital Commons
2000
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/2131 https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3130&context=scholarly_works |
| Summary: | The judiciary has repeatedly called on First Nations and the Crown not to tax the institutional competence of the judiciary by excessive litigation of disputes, and instead to attempt to reach negotiated settlements . It has also held that the Crown is under a duty to consult with a First Nation when it proposes to engage in an action that threatens to interfere with existing Aboriginal or treaty rights recognized and affirmed by s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. In this Article, the authors argue that the duty to consult requires the Crown, in most cases, to make good faith efforts to negotiate an agreement specifying the rights of the parties when it seeks to engage in an action that adversely affects Aboriginal interests. |
|---|