Bioturbation artifacts in zero-age sediments

Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2009. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Paleoceanography 24 (2009): PA4212, doi:10.1029/2008PA001727. Most seafloor sediments are date...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paleoceanography
Main Authors: Keigwin, Lloyd D., Guilderson, Thomas P.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1912/3646
Description
Summary:Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2009. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Paleoceanography 24 (2009): PA4212, doi:10.1029/2008PA001727. Most seafloor sediments are dated with radiocarbon, and the sediment is assumed to be zero-age (modern) when the signal of atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons is present (Fraction modern (Fm) > 1). Using a simple mass balance, we show that even with Fm > 1, half of the planktonic foraminifera at the seafloor can be centuries old, because of bioturbation. This calculation, and data from four core sites in the western North Atlantic indicate that, first, during some part of the Little Ice Age (LIA) there may have been more Antarctic Bottom Water than today in the deep western North Atlantic. Alternatively, bioturbation may have introduced much older benthic foraminifera into surface sediments. Second, paleo-based warming of Sargasso Sea surface waters since the LIA must lag the actual warming because of bioturbation of older and colder foraminifera. This work was funded in part by the Gary Comer Foundation and by NSF grant 0214144. A portion of this work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.