On the use of δ 18 O atm for ice core dating
Deep ice core chronologies have been improved over the past years through the addition of new age constraints. However, dating methods are still associated with large uncertainties for ice cores from the East Antarctic plateau where layer counting is not possible. Indeed, an uncertainty up to 6 ka i...
| Published in: | Quaternary Science Reviews |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/5db5e171-3f06-46c8-a2c1-65d05a96d685 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.02.008 https://hdl.handle.net/1871.1/5db5e171-3f06-46c8-a2c1-65d05a96d685 https://research.vu.nl/ws/files/118802166/On_the_use_of_18Oatm_for_ice_core_dating.pdf http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042489537&partnerID=8YFLogxK http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042489537&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
| Summary: | Deep ice core chronologies have been improved over the past years through the addition of new age constraints. However, dating methods are still associated with large uncertainties for ice cores from the East Antarctic plateau where layer counting is not possible. Indeed, an uncertainty up to 6 ka is associated with AICC2012 chronology of EPICA Dome C (EDC) ice core, which mostly arises from uncertainty on the delay between changes recorded in δ 18 O atm and in June 21 st insolation variations at 65°N used for ice core orbital dating. Consequently, we need to enhance the knowledge of this delay to improve ice core chronologies. We present new high-resolution EDC δ 18 O atm record (153–374 ka) and δO 2 /N 2 measurements (163–332 ka) performed on well-stored ice to provide continuous records of δ 18 O atm and δO 2 /N 2 between 100 and 800 ka. The comparison of δ 18 O atm with the δ 18 O calcite from East Asian speleothems shows that both signals present similar orbital and millennial variabilities, which may represent shifts in the InterTropical Convergence Zone position, themselves associated with Heinrich events. We thus propose to use the δ 18 O calcite as target for δ 18 O atm orbital dating. Such a tuning method improves the ice core chronology of the last glacial inception compared to AICC2012 by reconciling NGRIP and mid-latitude climatic records. It is especially marked during Dansgaard-Oeschger 25 where the proposed chronology is 2.2 ka older than AICC2012. This δ 18 O atm – δ 18 O calcite alignment method applied between 100 and 640 ka improves the EDC ice core chronology, especially over MIS 11, and leads to lower ice age uncertainties compared to AICC2012. |
|---|