Could meltwater pulses have sneaked unnoticed into the deep ocean during the last glacial?

The lack of climatic imprint left by the Meltwater Pulse-1A (≃14.5 ka BP), equivalent to a sea-level rise of 14 to 20 meters, is puzzling. Recent studies suggest the event might have occurred as a hyperpycnal flow in the Gulf of Mexico, preventing its detection in oceanic records throughout the Nort...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Roche, D.M.V.A.P., Renssen, H., Weber, S.L., Goosse, H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/08fde028-5ec7-41d3-9bfe-d0aa850d96bc
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032064
https://research.vu.nl/ws/files/2280814/204138.pdf
Description
Summary:The lack of climatic imprint left by the Meltwater Pulse-1A (≃14.5 ka BP), equivalent to a sea-level rise of 14 to 20 meters, is puzzling. Recent studies suggest the event might have occurred as a hyperpycnal flow in the Gulf of Mexico, preventing its detection in oceanic records throughout the North Atlantic. We present a suite of simulations with the LOVECLIM climate model, which mimic the effect of hyperpycnal flow under LGM conditions, in a first attempt to constrain its climatic effects. Analysing the ocean dynamics associated with the anomalous freshwater input, we show that the proposed mechanism is capable of sneaking a significant proportion of the MWP into the ocean (≃6 meters equivalent sea-level rise using our model under LGM boundary conditions). We also demonstrate that, in our model, the meridional circulation is more sensitive to such inputs in the Arctic Ocean than in the Gulf of Mexico. Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union.