Interactions of ENSO, the IOD, and the SAM in CMIP3 models

Simulations of individual global climate drivers using models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3(CMIP3) have been examined; however, the relationship among them has not been assessed. This is carried out to address several important issues, including the likelihood of the souther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Climate
Main Authors: Cai, Wenju, Sullivan, Arnold, Cowan, T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: American Meteorological Society 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z09wq/interactions-of-enso-the-iod-and-the-sam-in-cmip3-models
https://research.usq.edu.au/download/3ef79c89f6e6b665c4b616e1580e37b1f700eea0bfad3be44850279e304cc593/5204445/clim-2010jcli3744.1.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3744.1
Description
Summary:Simulations of individual global climate drivers using models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3(CMIP3) have been examined; however, the relationship among them has not been assessed. This is carried out to address several important issues, including the likelihood of the southern annular mode (SAM) forcing Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) events and the possible impact of the IOD on El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. Several conclusions emerge from statistics based on multimodel outputs. First, ENSO signals project strongly onto the SAM, although ENSO-forced signals tend to peak before ENSO. This feature is similar to the situation associated with the IOD. The IOD-induced signal over southern Australia, through stationary equivalent Rossby barotropic wave trains, peak before the IOD itself. Second, there is no control by the SAM on the IOD, in contrast to what has been suggested previously. Indeed, no model produces a SAM–IOD relationship that supports a positive (negative) SAM driving a positive (negative) IOD event. This is the case even in models that do not simulate a statistically significant relationship between ENSO and the IOD. Third, the IOD does have an impact on ENSO. The relationship between ENSO and the IOD in the majority of models is far weaker than the observed. However, the ENSO’s influence on the IOD is boosted by a spurious oceanic teleconnection, whereby ENSO discharge–recharge signals transmit to the Sumatra–Java coast, generating thermocline anomalies and changing IOD properties. Without the spurious oceanic teleconnection, the influence of the IOD on ENSO is comparable to the impact of ENSO on the IOD. Other model deficiencies are discussed.