Observation of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in “Stable” North America with GPS

Motions of three hundred and sixty Global Positioning System (GPS) sites in Canada and the United States yield a detailed image of the vertical and horizontal velocity fields within the nominally stable interior of the North American plate. By far the strongest signal is the effect of glacial isosta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Sella, Giovanni F., Stein, Seth, Dixon, Timothy H., Craymer, Michael, James, Thomas S., Mazzotti, Stephane, Dokka, Roy K.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Digital Commons @ University of South Florida 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/447
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027081
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/context/geo_facpub/article/1446/viewcontent/Sella_et_al_2007_Geophysical_Research_Letters__1_.pdf
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/context/geo_facpub/article/1446/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/readme.txt
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/context/geo_facpub/article/1446/filename/1/type/additional/viewcontent/Table_S1.txt
Description
Summary:Motions of three hundred and sixty Global Positioning System (GPS) sites in Canada and the United States yield a detailed image of the vertical and horizontal velocity fields within the nominally stable interior of the North American plate. By far the strongest signal is the effect of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) due to ice mass unloading during deglaciation. Vertical velocities show present-day uplift (∼10 mm/yr) near Hudson Bay, the site of thickest ice at the last glacial maximum. The uplift rates generally decrease with distance from Hudson Bay and change to subsidence (1–2 mm/yr) south of the Great Lakes. The “hinge line” separating uplift from subsidence is consistent with data from water level gauges along the Great Lakes, showing uplift along the northern shores and subsidence along the southern ones. Horizontal motions show outward motion from Hudson Bay with complex local variations especially in the far field. Although the vertical motions are generally consistent with the predictions of GIA models, the horizontal data illustrate the need and opportunity to improve the models via more accurate descriptions of the ice load and laterally variable mantle viscosity.