Sitting on all sides of the table? : OECD's role in Icelandic Education Policy 2030

The OECD is an inevitable force in contemporary education. This paper illustrates how the OECD affects recent education policy-making in Iceland with a particular focus on recent documents establishing the new Education Policy 2030 in Iceland and on OECD reports that directly relate to this policy....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
Main Authors: Magnússon, Gunnlaugur, Magnúsdóttir, Berglind Rós
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik, didaktik och utbildningssociologi 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-529758
https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2024.2360797
Description
Summary:The OECD is an inevitable force in contemporary education. This paper illustrates how the OECD affects recent education policy-making in Iceland with a particular focus on recent documents establishing the new Education Policy 2030 in Iceland and on OECD reports that directly relate to this policy. We illustrate the relationship between these documents both topically and chronologically and use Marilyn Strathern’s (2006) reasoning about policy making by bullet-points to understand these policy products. Our conclusions are that education policy 2030 is a clear step into a more Nordic tradition of policymaking, in terms of basing policy in previous works and official reports as well as increasing involvement by stakeholders. However, they are characterized by politically admirable, albeit lofty, formulations of ambitions and focus areas, rather than measurable, actionable and implementable policies. The OECD is given a great influence not only as a referential point and a tool to legitimate particular policies, but also a post-hoc policy-implementation adviser and auditor of the policy. Even though the OECD is asked for evaluation of the visionary policy and seems to be the solution to the perceived lack of professional procedure in Icelandic governance, the time-frame seems not to have allowed a thorough use of their advice. Policy Knowledge and Lesson Drawing in Nordic School Reform in an Era of International Comparison (POLNET)