Challenges with interpreting the impact of Atlantic Multidecadal Variability using SST-restoring experiments

Climate model simulations that restore SSTs in the North Atlantic have been used to explore the climate impacts of Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV). However, despite simulations and observations exhibiting similar North Atlantic SST anomalies, experiments with active SST-restoring in the Trop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
Main Authors: O’Reilly, Christopher H., Patterson, Matthew, Robson, Jon, Monerie, Paul Arthur, Hodson, Daniel, Ruprich-Robert, Yohan
Other Authors: Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Nature Research 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2117/385168
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00335-0
Description
Summary:Climate model simulations that restore SSTs in the North Atlantic have been used to explore the climate impacts of Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV). However, despite simulations and observations exhibiting similar North Atlantic SST anomalies, experiments with active SST-restoring in the Tropical North Atlantic exhibit strong positive surface heat-fluxes out of the ocean with warm SST anomalies, which is not replicated in other simulations or observations. The upward surface heat-fluxes that are systematically driven by the active SST-restoring in the Tropical North Atlantic are found to be crucial for generating a strong local precipitation response and the associated remote impact on the Pacific Walker circulation; these are both absent in other simulations. The results of this study strongly suggest that experiments employing SST-restoring (or prescribed SSTs) in the Tropical North Atlantic exaggerate the influence of the Atlantic on patterns of global climate anomalies and its role in recent multidecadal SST trends. COR was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship. MP was funded by the EUCP project (Horizon 2020; Grant Agreement 776613). JR was funded by NERC via the ACSIS program (NE/N018001/1) and via the WISHBONE project (NE/T013516/1). PAM was funded by the EMERGENCE project under the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC Grant NE/S004890/1) The project that gave rise to these results included YRR and received the support of a fellowship from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434) and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 847648 (fellowship code LCF/BQ/PR21/11840016). Peer Reviewed Postprint (published version)