Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss

The possibility that Arctic sea ice loss weakens mid-latitude westerlies, promoting more severe cold winters, has sparked more than a decade of scientific debate, with apparent support from observations but inconclusive modelling evidence. Here we show that sixteen models contributing to the Polar A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature Communications
Main Authors: Smith, Doug M., Eade, Rosie, Andrews, M. B., Ayres, Holly, Clark, A., Levine, Xavier, Ortega Montilla, Pablo
Other Authors: Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Nature Research 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2117/363693
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y
id ftupcatalunyair:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/363693
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech: UPCommons - Global access to UPC knowledge
op_collection_id ftupcatalunyair
language English
topic Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria agroalimentària::Ciències de la terra i de la vida
Sea ice--Arctic regions
North Atlantic oscillation
Atmospheric circulation
Atmospheric dynamics
Climate and Earth system modelling
Environmental health
Simulació per ordinador
spellingShingle Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria agroalimentària::Ciències de la terra i de la vida
Sea ice--Arctic regions
North Atlantic oscillation
Atmospheric circulation
Atmospheric dynamics
Climate and Earth system modelling
Environmental health
Simulació per ordinador
Smith, Doug M.
Eade, Rosie
Andrews, M. B.
Ayres, Holly
Clark, A.
Levine, Xavier
Ortega Montilla, Pablo
Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
topic_facet Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria agroalimentària::Ciències de la terra i de la vida
Sea ice--Arctic regions
North Atlantic oscillation
Atmospheric circulation
Atmospheric dynamics
Climate and Earth system modelling
Environmental health
Simulació per ordinador
description The possibility that Arctic sea ice loss weakens mid-latitude westerlies, promoting more severe cold winters, has sparked more than a decade of scientific debate, with apparent support from observations but inconclusive modelling evidence. Here we show that sixteen models contributing to the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project simulate a weakening of mid-latitude westerlies in response to projected Arctic sea ice loss. We develop an emergent constraint based on eddy feedback, which is 1.2 to 3 times too weak in the models, suggesting that the real-world weakening lies towards the higher end of the model simulations. Still, the modelled response to Arctic sea ice loss is weak: the North Atlantic Oscillation response is similar in magnitude and offsets the projected response to increased greenhouse gases, but would only account for around 10% of variations in individual years. We further find that relationships between Arctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation have weakened recently in observations and are no longer inconsistent with those in models. D.M.S., R.E., L.H., L.S.G., T.J., T.S., X.L., and P.O. were supported by the EU H2020 APPLICATE project (GA727862). The Met Office contribution was also supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS and Defra and by the UK-China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund. J.A.S was supported by NERC grants NE/P006760/1, NE/R005125/1 and NE/V005855/1. G.M and Y.P. were supported by the US Department of Energy, grant number DE-SC0019407. L.S.G was also supported by the Research council of Norway INES project (270061), and the Norwegian e-infrastructure for Research and Education (UNINETT Sigma2) through projects NN2345K, NS2345K and NS9034K. E.M. and D.M. acknowledge the support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the JPI Climate/JPI Oceans NextG-Climate Science-ROADMAP (FKZ: 01LP2002A) project and of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme through the Blue-Action Project (GA727852); and the use of resources from the DKRZ bm0966 and bm1190 projects. C. Deser acknowledges support from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the US National Science Foundation under cooperative agreement 1852977. M.M. was supported by MEXT through the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (JPMXD0717935457) and ArCS II (JPMXD1420318865) programs, and by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (JPMEERF20192004). J.G.-S. and P.O. were supported by the Spanish Ramón y Cajal’ programme (RYC-2016-21181, RYC-2016-22772). B.H. was jointly funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA19070404) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42030602, 91837101). G.G. was supported by the EU H2020 Blue–Action (GA727852) project and uses the HPC resources of TGCC under the allocations 2018-R0040110492 and 2019-A0060107732 made by GENCI. J.S. acknowledges the project L4 of the Collaborative Research Centre TRR 181 Energy Transfers in Atmosphere and Ocean funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Project 274762653. Peer Reviewed "Article signat per 31 autors/es: D. M. Smith, R. Eade, M. B. Andrews, H. Ayres, A. Clark, S. Chripko, C. Deser, N. J. Dunstone, J. García-Serrano, G. Gastineau, L. S. Graff, S. C. Hardiman, B. He, L. Hermanson, T. Jung, J. Knight, X. Levine, G. Magnusdottir, E. Manzini, D. Matei, M. Mori, R. Msadek, P. Ortega, Y. Peings, A. A. Scaife, J. A. Screen, M. Seabrook, T. Semmler, M. Sigmond, J. Streffing, L. Sun & A. Walsh " Postprint (published version)
author2 Barcelona Supercomputing Center
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Smith, Doug M.
Eade, Rosie
Andrews, M. B.
Ayres, Holly
Clark, A.
Levine, Xavier
Ortega Montilla, Pablo
author_facet Smith, Doug M.
Eade, Rosie
Andrews, M. B.
Ayres, Holly
Clark, A.
Levine, Xavier
Ortega Montilla, Pablo
author_sort Smith, Doug M.
title Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
title_short Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
title_full Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
title_fullStr Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
title_full_unstemmed Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss
title_sort robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future arctic sea ice loss
publisher Nature Research
publishDate 2022
url http://hdl.handle.net/2117/363693
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y
long_lat ENVELOPE(-57.950,-57.950,-63.950,-63.950)
ENVELOPE(173.533,173.533,-84.383,-84.383)
geographic Arctic
Norway
Ortega
Hermanson
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
Ortega
Hermanson
genre Arctic
Arctic
North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Sea ice
op_relation https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28283-y
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/727862/EU/Advanced Prediction in Polar regions and beyond: Modelling, observing system design and LInkages associated with ArctiC ClimATE change/APPLICATE
Smith, D.M. [et al.]. Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss. "Nature Communications", Febrer 2022, vol. 13, núm. 1, 727, p. 727.
2041-1723
http://hdl.handle.net/2117/363693
doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y
op_rights Attribution 3.0 Spain
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Open Access
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y
container_title Nature Communications
container_volume 13
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766296248466276352
spelling ftupcatalunyair:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/363693 2023-05-15T14:23:45+02:00 Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss Smith, Doug M. Eade, Rosie Andrews, M. B. Ayres, Holly Clark, A. Levine, Xavier Ortega Montilla, Pablo Barcelona Supercomputing Center 2022-02 15 p. application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2117/363693 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y eng eng Nature Research https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28283-y info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/727862/EU/Advanced Prediction in Polar regions and beyond: Modelling, observing system design and LInkages associated with ArctiC ClimATE change/APPLICATE Smith, D.M. [et al.]. Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss. "Nature Communications", Febrer 2022, vol. 13, núm. 1, 727, p. 727. 2041-1723 http://hdl.handle.net/2117/363693 doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y Attribution 3.0 Spain Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access CC-BY Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria agroalimentària::Ciències de la terra i de la vida Sea ice--Arctic regions North Atlantic oscillation Atmospheric circulation Atmospheric dynamics Climate and Earth system modelling Environmental health Simulació per ordinador Article 2022 ftupcatalunyair https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28283-y 2022-03-16T00:04:57Z The possibility that Arctic sea ice loss weakens mid-latitude westerlies, promoting more severe cold winters, has sparked more than a decade of scientific debate, with apparent support from observations but inconclusive modelling evidence. Here we show that sixteen models contributing to the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project simulate a weakening of mid-latitude westerlies in response to projected Arctic sea ice loss. We develop an emergent constraint based on eddy feedback, which is 1.2 to 3 times too weak in the models, suggesting that the real-world weakening lies towards the higher end of the model simulations. Still, the modelled response to Arctic sea ice loss is weak: the North Atlantic Oscillation response is similar in magnitude and offsets the projected response to increased greenhouse gases, but would only account for around 10% of variations in individual years. We further find that relationships between Arctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation have weakened recently in observations and are no longer inconsistent with those in models. D.M.S., R.E., L.H., L.S.G., T.J., T.S., X.L., and P.O. were supported by the EU H2020 APPLICATE project (GA727862). The Met Office contribution was also supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS and Defra and by the UK-China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund. J.A.S was supported by NERC grants NE/P006760/1, NE/R005125/1 and NE/V005855/1. G.M and Y.P. were supported by the US Department of Energy, grant number DE-SC0019407. L.S.G was also supported by the Research council of Norway INES project (270061), and the Norwegian e-infrastructure for Research and Education (UNINETT Sigma2) through projects NN2345K, NS2345K and NS9034K. E.M. and D.M. acknowledge the support of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the JPI Climate/JPI Oceans NextG-Climate Science-ROADMAP (FKZ: 01LP2002A) project and of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme through the Blue-Action Project (GA727852); and the use of resources from the DKRZ bm0966 and bm1190 projects. C. Deser acknowledges support from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is a major facility sponsored by the US National Science Foundation under cooperative agreement 1852977. M.M. was supported by MEXT through the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (JPMXD0717935457) and ArCS II (JPMXD1420318865) programs, and by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (JPMEERF20192004). J.G.-S. and P.O. were supported by the Spanish Ramón y Cajal’ programme (RYC-2016-21181, RYC-2016-22772). B.H. was jointly funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA19070404) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42030602, 91837101). G.G. was supported by the EU H2020 Blue–Action (GA727852) project and uses the HPC resources of TGCC under the allocations 2018-R0040110492 and 2019-A0060107732 made by GENCI. J.S. acknowledges the project L4 of the Collaborative Research Centre TRR 181 Energy Transfers in Atmosphere and Ocean funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Project 274762653. Peer Reviewed "Article signat per 31 autors/es: D. M. Smith, R. Eade, M. B. Andrews, H. Ayres, A. Clark, S. Chripko, C. Deser, N. J. Dunstone, J. García-Serrano, G. Gastineau, L. S. Graff, S. C. Hardiman, B. He, L. Hermanson, T. Jung, J. Knight, X. Levine, G. Magnusdottir, E. Manzini, D. Matei, M. Mori, R. Msadek, P. Ortega, Y. Peings, A. A. Scaife, J. A. Screen, M. Seabrook, T. Semmler, M. Sigmond, J. Streffing, L. Sun & A. Walsh " Postprint (published version) Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Sea ice Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech: UPCommons - Global access to UPC knowledge Arctic Norway Ortega ENVELOPE(-57.950,-57.950,-63.950,-63.950) Hermanson ENVELOPE(173.533,173.533,-84.383,-84.383) Nature Communications 13 1