Pucaj! Georgea Boweringa: neispričana priča o pokoravanju kanadskog Zapada

• Main Author: Polić, Vanja
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: Croatian
• Published: Hrvatsko filološko društvo 2013
• Subjects: English language and literature; British Columbia; Canada; Coleman; Pratt; First Nations
• Online Access: http://darhiv.ffzg.unizg.hr/id/eprint/8118/; http://hrcak.srce.hr/161715; http://darhiv.ffzg.unizg.hr/id/eprint/8118/1/Polic.pdf

U radu će se analizirati roman Shoot! (Pucaj!) (1994) kanadskog autora Georgea Boweringa s obzirom na način na koji postkolonijalnim čitanjem dekonstruira veliku pripovijest (grand récit) bijele povijesti kanadske provincije Britanske Kolumbije na primjeru povijesnih likova, kanadskih mestika braće McLean. Pritom će težište analize biti na strategijama konstruiranja bijele imperijalne povijesti pomoću koncepata bijele uljuđenosti (Coleman), bijele kože (whiteness) i hijerarhije unutar bijelosti, britanskosti (Britishness) kojom se ta hijerarhija nastojala poništiti, te održavanja reda u društvu pomoću zakona. Pokazat će se kako u romanu funkcioniraju polifonija i dijalogičnost (Bahtin) stavljanjem u prvi plan zatomljenih pripovijesti Prvih naroda i naroda Métis te kako roman koji pripada historiografskoj metafikciji (Hutcheon), služeći se fragmentiranim pripovjednim nizovima i ironijom, nudi mnogostranu povijest nastanka kanadskog društva. The article analyzes strategies by which Canadian writer George Bowering in the novel Shoot! (1994) deconstructs the master narrative of the white settlement of Canada on the example of a historical event, the story of the McLean brothers and Alex Hare, excluded from the official history of the Canadian province of British Columbia. Strategies of the construction of white history are dissected, especially with regard to the construction of white colonial identity and legitimation of land appropriation: those are the concept of white civility based on the isochronous understanding of societal development which justifies English superiority over other societies; the concept of Britishness through which the subordinated ethnicities within the British isles erased their differences and adopted English identity before the rest of the world; belief in the imperial legislation as the guarantee of the society’s civility. Colonization and racism were also justified through these white discourses. Bowering in the novel offers a counter-discourse to the white monologism through the polyphony and dialogism because the novel is literally a weave of numerous stories from the oral traditions of the First Nations as well as stories from white historical archives. Postcolonial analysis of the novel shows how from the white perspective the contact zone (Pratt) produced the abject (Kristeva), the unwanted »race« of the Métis who were perceived as a threat to the ordered white society and were proof of the dark side of land appropriation and abuse of the indigenous people. The article also discusses the colonial policy of identifying First Nations and Métis with children, Queen’s people, which was yet another legitimation tactic for the depravation of the autochthonous population in Canada. Finally, it is shown how Bowering uses irony to indicate the necessity of a wider reconceptualization of the official Canadian history.