TCCON and NDACC XCO measurements: difference, discussion and application

• Main Authors: Zhou, Minqiang, Langerock, Bavo, Vigouroux, C, Sha, Mahesh Kumar, Hermans, Christian, Metzger, Jean-Marc, Chen, Huilin, Ramonet, Michel, Kivi, Rigel, Heikkinen, Pauli, Smale, D, Pollard, David F, Jones, Nicholas B, Velazco, Voltaire A, Garcia, Omaira E, Schneider, Matthias, Palm, Mathias, Warneke, Thorsten, de Maziere, Martine
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Research Online 2019
• Subjects: ndacc; xco; tccon; measurements: discussion; difference; application; Ny-Ålesund; Ny Ålesund
• Online Access: https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers1/1040; https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2054&context=smhpapers1

Column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO (XCO) measurements are obtained from two ground-based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer networks: the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). In this study, the differences between the TCCON and NDACC XCO measurements are investigated and discussed based on six NDACC-TCCON sites using data over the period 2007-2017. A direct comparison shows that the NDACC XCO measurements are about 5.5 % larger than the TCCON data at Ny-Ålesund, Bremen, and Izaña (Northern Hemisphere), and the absolute bias between the NDACC and TCCON data is within 2 % at Saint-Denis, Wollongong and Lauder (Southern Hemisphere). The hemispheric dependence of the bias is mainly attributed to their smoothing errors. The systematic smoothing error of the TCCON XCO data varies in the range between 0.2 % (Bremen) and 7.9 % (Lauder), and the random smoothing error varies in the range between 2.0 % and 3.6 %.