A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects t...
| Published in: | Scientific Reports |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
Scholarship at UWindsor
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/glierpub/644 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7 https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/context/glierpub/article/1646/viewcontent/s41598_022_22492_7.pdf |
| Summary: | Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders. |
|---|