Evaluation of air-soil temperature relationships simulated by land surface models during winter across the permafrost region

• Published in: The Cryosphere
• Main Authors: Wang, Wenli, Rinke, Annette, Moore, John C., Ji, Duoying, Cui, Xuefeng, Peng, Shushi, Lawrence, David M., McGuire, A. David, Burke, Eleanor J., Chen, Xiaodong, Decharme, Bertrand, Koven, Charles D., MacDougall, Andrew S., Saito, Kazuyuki, Zhang, Wenxin, Alkama, Ramdane, Bohn, Theodore J., Ciais, Philippe, Delire, Christine, Gouttevin, Isabelle, Hajima, Tomohiro, Krinner, Gerhard, Lettenmaier, Dennis P., Miller, Paul A., Smith, Benjamin (R19508), Sueyoshi, Tetsuo, Sherstiukov, Artem B.
• Other Authors: Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment (Host institution)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Germany, Copernicus 2016
• Subjects: XXXXXX - Unknown; soil temperature; permafrost; snow; insulation (heat); Northern Hemisphere; The Cryosphere
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1721-2016; http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:48459

A realistic simulation of snow cover and its thermal properties are important for accurate modelling of permafrost. We analyse simulated relationships between air and near-surface (20 cm) soil temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere permafrost region during winter, with a particular focus on snow insulation effects in nine land surface models, and compare them with observations from 268 Russian stations. There are large cross-model differences in the simulated differences between near-surface soil and air temperatures (1T 3 to 14 _C), in the sensitivity of soil-to-air temperature (0.13 to 0.96 _C_C????1), and in the relationship between 1T and snow depth. The observed relationship between 1T and snow depth can be used as a metric to evaluate the effects of each model’s representation of snow insulation, hence guide improvements to the model’s conceptual structure and process parameterisations. Models with better performance apply multilayer snow schemes and consider complex snow processes. Some models show poor performance in representing snow insulation due to underestimation of snow depth and/or overestimation of snow conductivity. Generally, models identified as most acceptable with respect to snow insulation simulate reasonable areas of nearsurface permafrost (13.19 to 15.77 million km2/. However, there is not a simple relationship between the sophistication of the snow insulation in the acceptable models and the simulated area of Northern Hemisphere near-surface permafrost, because several other factors, such as soil depth used in the models, the treatment of soil organic matter content, hydrology and vegetation cover, also affect the simulated permafrost distribution.