Comparing methods to approach cumulative effects in the North-East Atlantic: CUMULEO case study

OSPAR Intersessional Correspondence Group – Cumulative Effects (ICG-C), part of OSPAR commission Environmental Impact of Human Activities (EIHA), is seeking for common approaches on (cross-border) cumulative effects. At the OSPAR ICG-C meeting of 12-13 December 2012 (Copenhagen), three cumulative ef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van der Wal, J.T., Tamis, J.E.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: IMARES 2014
Subjects:
case studies
environmental impact
human activity
marine areas
residual effects
spatial models
gevalsanalyse
mariene gebieden
menselijke activiteit
milieueffect
resteffecten
ruimtelijke modellen
North East Atlantic
Online Access:https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/comparing-methods-to-approach-cumulative-effects-in-the-north-eas
Description
Summary:OSPAR Intersessional Correspondence Group – Cumulative Effects (ICG-C), part of OSPAR commission Environmental Impact of Human Activities (EIHA), is seeking for common approaches on (cross-border) cumulative effects. At the OSPAR ICG-C meeting of 12-13 December 2012 (Copenhagen), three cumulative effects assessment (CEA) methods have been discussed: CUMULEO; ODEMM; and HARMONY. It was concluded that a case study could help in finding best available approaches and tools within the three methods for a specific question. This report describes the case study based on the CUMULEO method.

Similar Items