Occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and electrical shocks and acute myeloid leukemia in four Nordic countries

OBJECTIVE: We studied the association between occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and electrical shocks and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the Nordic Occupational Cancer cohort (NOCCA). METHODS: We included 5,409 adult AML cases diagnosed between 1961 and 2005...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Talibov, Madar, Guxens, Monica, Pukkala, Eero, Huss, Anke, Kromhout, Hans, Slottje, Pauline, Martinsen, Jan Ivar, Kjaerheim, Kristina, Sparén, Pär, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Tryggvadottir, Laufey, Uuksulainen, Sanni, Vermeulen, Roel
Other Authors: Risk Assessment, dIRAS RA-I&I RA, dIRAS RA-2, LS IRAS EEPI EXAS (Arb.hyg+bl.st.kar.), LS IRAS EEPI GRA (Gezh.risico-analyse), Infection & Immunity
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/329345
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE: We studied the association between occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) and electrical shocks and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the Nordic Occupational Cancer cohort (NOCCA). METHODS: We included 5,409 adult AML cases diagnosed between 1961 and 2005 in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden and 27,045 controls matched by age, sex, and country. Lifetime occupational ELF-MF exposure and risk of electrical shocks were assigned to jobs reported in the censuses using job-exposure matrices. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) using conditional logistic regression adjusted for concurrent occupational exposures relevant for AML risk (e.g., benzene, ionizing radiation). We conducted sensitivity analyses with different assumptions to assess the robustness of our results. RESULTS: Approximately 40 % of the subjects were ever occupationally exposed to low levels and 7 % to high levels of ELF-MF, whereas 18 % were ever at low risk and 15 % at high risk of electrical shocks. We did not observe an association between occupational exposure to neither ELF-MF nor electrical shocks and AML. The HR was 0.88 (95 % CI 0.77-1.01) for subjects with high levels of ELF-MF exposure and 0.94 (95 % CI 0.85-1.05) for subjects with high risk of electrical shocks as compared to those with background-level exposure. Results remained materially unchanged in sensitivity analyses with different assumptions. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support an association between occupational ELF-MF or electric shock exposure and AML.