Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures

Published version. Source at http://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3118-x . Summary We tested whether cortical porosity of the proximal femur measured using StrAx1.0 software provides additional information to areal bone mineral density (aBMD) or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) in differentiating w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Osteoporosis International
Main Authors: Ahmed, Luai Awad, Shigdel, Rajesh, Joakimsen, Ragnar Martin, Eldevik, Odd Petter, Eriksen, Erik Fink, Ghasem-Zadeh, Ali, Bala, Yohann, Zebaze, Roger, Seeman, Ego, Bjørnerem, Åshild
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/9023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3118-x
Description
Summary:Published version. Source at http://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3118-x . Summary We tested whether cortical porosity of the proximal femur measured using StrAx1.0 software provides additional information to areal bone mineral density (aBMD) or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) in differentiating women with and without fracture. Porosity was associated with fracture independent of aBMD and FRAX and identified additional women with fractures than by osteoporosis or FRAX thresholds. Introduction Neither aBMD nor the FRAX captures cortical porosity, a major determinant of bone strength. We therefore tested whether combining porosity with aBMD or FRAX improves identification of women with fractures. Methods We quantified femoral neck (FN) aBMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, FRAX score, and femoral subtrochanteric cortical porosity using StrAx1.0 software in 211 postmenopausal women aged 54–94 years with nonvertebral fractures and 232 controls in Tromsø, Norway. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Results Women with fractures had lower FN aBMD, higher FRAX score, and higher cortical porosity than controls (all p < 0.001). Each standard deviation higher porosity was associated with fracture independent of FN aBMD (OR 1.39; 95 % confidence interval 1.11–1.74) and FRAX score (OR 1.58; 1.27–1.97) in all women combined. Porosity was also associated with fracture independent of FRAX score in subgroups with normal FN aBMD (OR 1.88; 1.21–2.94), osteopenia (OR 1.40; 1.06–1.85), but not significantly in those with osteoporosis (OR 1.48; 0.68–3.23). Of the 211 fracture cases, only 18 women (9 %) were identified using FN aBMD T-score < −2.5, 45 women (21 %) using FRAX threshold >20 %, whereas porosity >80th percentile identified 61 women (29 %). Porosity identified 26 % additional women with fractures than identified by the osteoporosis threshold and 21 % additional women with fractures than by this FRAX threshold. Conclusions Cortical porosity is a risk factor for fracture independent of aBMD and FRAX and improves identification of women with fracture.