Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?

This is accepted manuscript version. Published version available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X This article engages with knowledge management in governing vulnerable polar areas and tourism. Since the 1870’s Svalbard has been a cruise tourism destination. Due to less ice during the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Nyseth, Torill, Viken, Arvid
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8520
https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X
_version_ 1829305312619790336
author Nyseth, Torill
Viken, Arvid
author_facet Nyseth, Torill
Viken, Arvid
author_sort Nyseth, Torill
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
container_issue 1
container_start_page 66
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 52
description This is accepted manuscript version. Published version available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X This article engages with knowledge management in governing vulnerable polar areas and tourism. Since the 1870’s Svalbard has been a cruise tourism destination. Due to less ice during the summer period, the number of tourists visiting the remote northeast corner of the archipelago has increased significantly and the potential negative impact on this vulnerable natural environment has become an issue. The standard modes of managing these areas have either been to apply the precautionary principle or measures based on scientific evidence. As management models, both principles are however, for a number of reasons contested. This paper argues for a third model, partly practiced based on a form of monitoring knowledge circulating in 'communities of practice' developed over time. This form of knowledge constitute viable expertise for governing and management of the environment-tourism nexus in the areas but needs to be acknowledged as a complementary management platform. The article demonstrates how such monitoring can be done, and suggests some principles for developing monitoring knowledge for administrative and management puposes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Svalbard
genre_facet Arctic
Svalbard
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/8520
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
op_container_end_page 75
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X
op_relation FRIDAID 1258365
doi:10.1017/S003224741500039X
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8520
op_rights openAccess
publishDate 2015
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/8520 2025-04-13T14:14:37+00:00 Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle? Nyseth, Torill Viken, Arvid 2015-06-03 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8520 https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X eng eng Cambridge University Press FRIDAID 1258365 doi:10.1017/S003224741500039X https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8520 openAccess VDP::Social science: 200 VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed 2015 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X 2025-03-14T05:17:55Z This is accepted manuscript version. Published version available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X This article engages with knowledge management in governing vulnerable polar areas and tourism. Since the 1870’s Svalbard has been a cruise tourism destination. Due to less ice during the summer period, the number of tourists visiting the remote northeast corner of the archipelago has increased significantly and the potential negative impact on this vulnerable natural environment has become an issue. The standard modes of managing these areas have either been to apply the precautionary principle or measures based on scientific evidence. As management models, both principles are however, for a number of reasons contested. This paper argues for a third model, partly practiced based on a form of monitoring knowledge circulating in 'communities of practice' developed over time. This form of knowledge constitute viable expertise for governing and management of the environment-tourism nexus in the areas but needs to be acknowledged as a complementary management platform. The article demonstrates how such monitoring can be done, and suggests some principles for developing monitoring knowledge for administrative and management puposes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Svalbard University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Arctic Svalbard Polar Record 52 1 66 75
spellingShingle VDP::Social science: 200
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200
Nyseth, Torill
Viken, Arvid
Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
title Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
title_full Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
title_fullStr Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
title_full_unstemmed Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
title_short Communities of practice in the management of an Arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
title_sort communities of practice in the management of an arctic environment: monitoring knowledge as complementary to scientific knowledge and the precautionary principle?
topic VDP::Social science: 200
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200
topic_facet VDP::Social science: 200
VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8520
https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224741500039X