Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthe...
Published in: | Journal of Pain Research |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
DovePress
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 |
_version_ | 1829312871028228096 |
---|---|
author | Antunes, Marisa Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes Gjessing, Petter Fosse Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske |
author_facet | Antunes, Marisa Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes Gjessing, Petter Fosse Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske |
author_sort | Antunes, Marisa |
collection | University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive |
container_start_page | 1855 |
container_title | Journal of Pain Research |
container_volume | Volume 16 |
description | Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and 2) to provide power and sample size estimations for potential differences between the groups. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and oral morphine equivalent (OMEq) consumption. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation at the University Hospital of North Norway were randomised to spinal (n=5) or a sham spinal procedure (n=5). Numeric rating scale (NRS) and OMEq were monitored postoperatively for 72 h. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, and ASA were not significantly different between the groups. During surgery, patients in the spinal group received less remifentanil (p=0.06). NRS was lower in the spinal group 1 hr after admittance to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (p=0.06) and on the first postoperative day at 8 AM (p=0.03). OMEq consumption in the PACU was lower in the spinal group (p=0.008), but no differences between the groups were detected after discharge to the ward. Sample size estimations revealed that eight patients in each group would be needed to study potential NRS differences after admission to the PACU and 23 patients in each group to study potential differences in OMEq consumption on day 1. Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Data from the current study should be followed up by a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | North Norway |
genre_facet | North Norway |
geographic | Norway |
geographic_facet | Norway |
id | ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/30043 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivtroemsoe |
op_container_end_page | 1865 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 |
op_relation | Journal of Pain Research FRIDAID 2157262 doi:10.2147/JPR.S410019 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 |
op_rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Copyright 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | DovePress |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/30043 2025-04-13T14:24:14+00:00 Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation Antunes, Marisa Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes Gjessing, Petter Fosse Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske 2023-05-31 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 eng eng DovePress Journal of Pain Research FRIDAID 2157262 doi:10.2147/JPR.S410019 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Copyright 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2023 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and 2) to provide power and sample size estimations for potential differences between the groups. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and oral morphine equivalent (OMEq) consumption. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation at the University Hospital of North Norway were randomised to spinal (n=5) or a sham spinal procedure (n=5). Numeric rating scale (NRS) and OMEq were monitored postoperatively for 72 h. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, and ASA were not significantly different between the groups. During surgery, patients in the spinal group received less remifentanil (p=0.06). NRS was lower in the spinal group 1 hr after admittance to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (p=0.06) and on the first postoperative day at 8 AM (p=0.03). OMEq consumption in the PACU was lower in the spinal group (p=0.008), but no differences between the groups were detected after discharge to the ward. Sample size estimations revealed that eight patients in each group would be needed to study potential NRS differences after admission to the PACU and 23 patients in each group to study potential differences in OMEq consumption on day 1. Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Data from the current study should be followed up by a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Norway University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Norway Journal of Pain Research Volume 16 1855 1865 |
spellingShingle | Antunes, Marisa Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes Gjessing, Petter Fosse Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation |
title | Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation |
title_full | Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation |
title_fullStr | Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation |
title_full_unstemmed | Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation |
title_short | Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation |
title_sort | spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 |