Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation

Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Pain Research
Main Authors: Antunes, Marisa, Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes, Gjessing, Petter Fosse, Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: DovePress 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043
https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019
_version_ 1829312871028228096
author Antunes, Marisa
Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes
Gjessing, Petter Fosse
Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske
author_facet Antunes, Marisa
Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes
Gjessing, Petter Fosse
Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske
author_sort Antunes, Marisa
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
container_start_page 1855
container_title Journal of Pain Research
container_volume Volume 16
description Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and 2) to provide power and sample size estimations for potential differences between the groups. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and oral morphine equivalent (OMEq) consumption. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation at the University Hospital of North Norway were randomised to spinal (n=5) or a sham spinal procedure (n=5). Numeric rating scale (NRS) and OMEq were monitored postoperatively for 72 h. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, and ASA were not significantly different between the groups. During surgery, patients in the spinal group received less remifentanil (p=0.06). NRS was lower in the spinal group 1 hr after admittance to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (p=0.06) and on the first postoperative day at 8 AM (p=0.03). OMEq consumption in the PACU was lower in the spinal group (p=0.008), but no differences between the groups were detected after discharge to the ward. Sample size estimations revealed that eight patients in each group would be needed to study potential NRS differences after admission to the PACU and 23 patients in each group to study potential differences in OMEq consumption on day 1. Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Data from the current study should be followed up by a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre North Norway
genre_facet North Norway
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/30043
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
op_container_end_page 1865
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019
op_relation Journal of Pain Research
FRIDAID 2157262
doi:10.2147/JPR.S410019
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright 2023 The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
publishDate 2023
publisher DovePress
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/30043 2025-04-13T14:24:14+00:00 Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation Antunes, Marisa Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes Gjessing, Petter Fosse Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske 2023-05-31 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 eng eng DovePress Journal of Pain Research FRIDAID 2157262 doi:10.2147/JPR.S410019 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Copyright 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed publishedVersion 2023 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z Background: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. We designed a randomized double blinded pilot study with two objectives: 1) to explore potential benefits of spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and 2) to provide power and sample size estimations for potential differences between the groups. Primary outcome measures were postoperative pain and oral morphine equivalent (OMEq) consumption. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation at the University Hospital of North Norway were randomised to spinal (n=5) or a sham spinal procedure (n=5). Numeric rating scale (NRS) and OMEq were monitored postoperatively for 72 h. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, and ASA were not significantly different between the groups. During surgery, patients in the spinal group received less remifentanil (p=0.06). NRS was lower in the spinal group 1 hr after admittance to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) (p=0.06) and on the first postoperative day at 8 AM (p=0.03). OMEq consumption in the PACU was lower in the spinal group (p=0.008), but no differences between the groups were detected after discharge to the ward. Sample size estimations revealed that eight patients in each group would be needed to study potential NRS differences after admission to the PACU and 23 patients in each group to study potential differences in OMEq consumption on day 1. Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation. Data from the current study should be followed up by a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Norway University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Norway Journal of Pain Research Volume 16 1855 1865
spellingShingle Antunes, Marisa
Baumgärtel, Aleksander Johannes
Gjessing, Petter Fosse
Ytrebø, Lars Marius Giske
Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
title Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
title_full Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
title_fullStr Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
title_short Spinal Anaesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Rectal Amputation
title_sort spinal anaesthesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputation
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30043
https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S410019