A year-round satellite sea-ice thickness record from CryoSat-2

Arctic sea ice is diminishing with climate warming at a rate unmatched for at least 1,000 years. As the receding ice pack raises commercial interest in the Arctic, it has become more variable and mobile, which increases safety risks to maritime users. Satellite observations of sea-ice thickness are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature
Main Authors: Landy, Jack Christopher, Dawson, Geoffrey, Tsamados, Michel, Bushuk, Mitchell, Stroeve, Julienne C., Howell, Stephen, Krumpen, Thomas, Babb, David G., Komarov, Alexander S., Heorton, Harold, Belter, H. Jakob, Aksenov, Yevgeny
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26936
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05058-5
Description
Summary:Arctic sea ice is diminishing with climate warming at a rate unmatched for at least 1,000 years. As the receding ice pack raises commercial interest in the Arctic, it has become more variable and mobile, which increases safety risks to maritime users. Satellite observations of sea-ice thickness are currently unavailable during the crucial melt period from May to September, when they would be most valuable for applications such as seasonal forecasting, owing to major challenges in the processing of altimetry data. Here we use deep learning and numerical simulations of the CryoSat-2 radar altimeter response to overcome these challenges and generate a pan-Arctic sea-ice thickness dataset for the Arctic melt period. CryoSat-2 observations capture the spatial and the temporal patterns of ice melting rates recorded by independent sensors and match the time series of sea-ice volume modelled by the Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modelling and Assimilation System reanalysis. Between 2011 and 2020, Arctic sea-ice thickness was 1.87 ± 0.10 m at the start of the melting season in May and 0.82 ± 0.11 m by the end of the melting season in August. Our year-round sea-ice thickness record unlocks opportunities for understanding Arctic climate feedbacks on different timescales. For instance, sea-ice volume observations from the early summer may extend the lead time of skilful August–October sea-ice forecasts by several months, at the peak of the Arctic shipping season.