Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
Source at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The surveys were und...
Published in: | International Journal of the Commons |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 |
_version_ | 1829313114497089536 |
---|---|
author | Fedreheim, Gunn Elin Blanco, Ester |
author_facet | Fedreheim, Gunn Elin Blanco, Ester |
author_sort | Fedreheim, Gunn Elin |
collection | University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 754 |
container_title | International Journal of the Commons |
container_volume | 11 |
description | Source at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The surveys were undertaken just before a change to co-management in 2010. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explain actors’ initial support of the governance change as a means to alleviate conflict are (i) the relationship of actors to the protected areas in terms of knowledge of the protected areas and mental models on conservation and (ii) the economic relevance of the areas for them. Traditionally, other sociocultural variables such as indigenous background (Sámi), age, and gender have been considered relevant and were also identified as significant attributes that define preferences for conservation management alternatives. We build on the quantitative findings on actors’ perceptions to develop a broader discussion on the relationship of the new management model for protected areas implemented and conflict resolution on land conservation in the country. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Northern Norway |
genre_facet | Northern Norway |
geographic | Norway |
geographic_facet | Norway |
id | ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/12363 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivtroemsoe |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 |
op_relation | International Journal of the Commons info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/AREAL/173070/Norway/Protected Areas as Resourced for Coastal and Rural Business Development// https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/749/ FRIDAID 1467723 doi:10.18352/ijc.749 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 |
op_rights | openAccess |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/12363 2025-04-13T14:24:31+00:00 Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. Fedreheim, Gunn Elin Blanco, Ester 2017-10-16 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 eng eng Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals International Journal of the Commons info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/AREAL/173070/Norway/Protected Areas as Resourced for Coastal and Rural Business Development// https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/749/ FRIDAID 1467723 doi:10.18352/ijc.749 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 openAccess VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236 VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed 2017 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z Source at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The surveys were undertaken just before a change to co-management in 2010. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explain actors’ initial support of the governance change as a means to alleviate conflict are (i) the relationship of actors to the protected areas in terms of knowledge of the protected areas and mental models on conservation and (ii) the economic relevance of the areas for them. Traditionally, other sociocultural variables such as indigenous background (Sámi), age, and gender have been considered relevant and were also identified as significant attributes that define preferences for conservation management alternatives. We build on the quantitative findings on actors’ perceptions to develop a broader discussion on the relationship of the new management model for protected areas implemented and conflict resolution on land conservation in the country. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Norway International Journal of the Commons 11 2 754 |
spellingShingle | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236 VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236 Fedreheim, Gunn Elin Blanco, Ester Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. |
title | Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. |
title_full | Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. |
title_fullStr | Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. |
title_short | Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. |
title_sort | co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: experiences in norway. |
topic | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236 VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236 |
topic_facet | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236 VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236 |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 |