Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.

Source at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The surveys were und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of the Commons
Main Authors: Fedreheim, Gunn Elin, Blanco, Ester
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363
https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749
_version_ 1829313114497089536
author Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
Blanco, Ester
author_facet Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
Blanco, Ester
author_sort Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
collection University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive
container_issue 2
container_start_page 754
container_title International Journal of the Commons
container_volume 11
description Source at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The surveys were undertaken just before a change to co-management in 2010. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explain actors’ initial support of the governance change as a means to alleviate conflict are (i) the relationship of actors to the protected areas in terms of knowledge of the protected areas and mental models on conservation and (ii) the economic relevance of the areas for them. Traditionally, other sociocultural variables such as indigenous background (Sámi), age, and gender have been considered relevant and were also identified as significant attributes that define preferences for conservation management alternatives. We build on the quantitative findings on actors’ perceptions to develop a broader discussion on the relationship of the new management model for protected areas implemented and conflict resolution on land conservation in the country.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
id ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/12363
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivtroemsoe
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749
op_relation International Journal of the Commons
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/AREAL/173070/Norway/Protected Areas as Resourced for Coastal and Rural Business Development//
https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/749/
FRIDAID 1467723
doi:10.18352/ijc.749
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363
op_rights openAccess
publishDate 2017
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtroemsoe:oai:munin.uit.no:10037/12363 2025-04-13T14:24:31+00:00 Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. Fedreheim, Gunn Elin Blanco, Ester 2017-10-16 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 eng eng Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals International Journal of the Commons info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/AREAL/173070/Norway/Protected Areas as Resourced for Coastal and Rural Business Development// https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/749/ FRIDAID 1467723 doi:10.18352/ijc.749 https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363 openAccess VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236 VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed 2017 ftunivtroemsoe https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 2025-03-14T05:17:56Z Source at: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749 This paper addresses the perceptions of actors of protected areas in Norway about a co-management regime at the local level. The analysis is based on quantitative data from surveys of actors of eight protected areas in northern Norway. The surveys were undertaken just before a change to co-management in 2010. The results show that the two strongest determinants that explain actors’ initial support of the governance change as a means to alleviate conflict are (i) the relationship of actors to the protected areas in terms of knowledge of the protected areas and mental models on conservation and (ii) the economic relevance of the areas for them. Traditionally, other sociocultural variables such as indigenous background (Sámi), age, and gender have been considered relevant and were also identified as significant attributes that define preferences for conservation management alternatives. We build on the quantitative findings on actors’ perceptions to develop a broader discussion on the relationship of the new management model for protected areas implemented and conflict resolution on land conservation in the country. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Norway University of Tromsø: Munin Open Research Archive Norway International Journal of the Commons 11 2 754
spellingShingle VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236
VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236
Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
Blanco, Ester
Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
title Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
title_full Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
title_fullStr Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
title_full_unstemmed Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
title_short Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway.
title_sort co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: experiences in norway.
topic VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236
VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236
topic_facet VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Urbanisme og fysisk planlegging: 230::Landskapsplanlegging: 236
VDP::Social science: 200::Urbanism and physical planning: 230::Landscape planning: 236
url https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12363
https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749