An experimental study of smelt-water interaction in the recovery boiler dissolving tank
A laboratory apparatus was constructed to simulate the operating conditions of recovery boiler smelt dissolving tanks and used to systematically study the interaction between molten smelt droplets and water. Experiments were performed on synthetic smelt made of 80 wt% Na 2 CO 3 and 20 wt% NaCl at 80...
| Published in: | TAPPI Journal |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
TAPPI Press
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/97451 https://doi.org/10.32964/tj14.6.385 |
| Summary: | A laboratory apparatus was constructed to simulate the operating conditions of recovery boiler smelt dissolving tanks and used to systematically study the interaction between molten smelt droplets and water. Experiments were performed on synthetic smelt made of 80 wt% Na 2 CO 3 and 20 wt% NaCl at 800°C, 900°C, and 1000°C. The results show that upon contact with water, some smelt droplets explode immediately and break into small pieces, some require a delay time to explode, and others solidify without exploding. The probability of explosion strongly depends on water temperature and to some extent, smelt temperature. At a given smelt temperature, there exists a water temperature range below which explosion always occurs (the lower critical water temperature) and above which there is no explosion (the upper critical water temperature). The lower critical water temperature decreases with increasing smelt temperature, while the upper critical water temperature remains the same at 82°C in all cases. Up to this upper critical water temperature, both the explosion delay time and explosion intensity increase with increasing water temperature. The data was used to construct a Smelt-Water Interaction Temperature (SWIT) diagram that can predict if a molten synthetic smelt droplet will explode in water at different smelt and water temperatures. This work was conducted as part of the research program on “Increasing Energy and Chemical Recovery Efficiency in the Kraft Process – III,” jointly supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and a consortium of the following companies: Andritz, AV Nackawic, Babcock & Wilcox, Boise, Carter Holt Harvey, Celulose Nipo-Brasileira, Clyde-Bergemann, DMI Peace River Pulp, Eldorado, ERCO Worldwide, Fibria, FP Innovations, International Paper, Irving Pulp & Paper, Kiln Flame Systems, Klabin, MeadWestvaco, Metso Power, StoraEnso Research, Suzano, Tembec, and Tolko Industries. The authors also wish to acknowledge Dr. Thomas M. Grace for his comments on the manuscript. |
|---|