Some Thoughts on Estimating Change to Arctic Cod Populations from Hypothetical Oil Spills in the Eastern Alaska Beaufort Sea
We describe a fecundity-hindcast model that incorporates Arctic cod Boreogadus saida acute toxicity data, field studies of Arctic cod larval distribution and abundance, natural mortality estimates for Arctic cod eggs and larvae, and an oil spill fate model in Alaska Beaufort Sea. Three orders of mag...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
NRC Research Press (a division of Canadian Science Publishing)
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/78838 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/AS-2016-0056 |
| Summary: | We describe a fecundity-hindcast model that incorporates Arctic cod Boreogadus saida acute toxicity data, field studies of Arctic cod larval distribution and abundance, natural mortality estimates for Arctic cod eggs and larvae, and an oil spill fate model in Alaska Beaufort Sea. Three orders of magnitude of spill events (1,000 tons, 10,000 tons, 100,000 tons) were evaluated for both physically and chemically dispersed oil. Using worst-case assumptions in our model, a 100,000-ton spill of crude oil treated with dispersants resulted in 266 million m3 of water that exceeded our acute toxicity threshold, compared to a volume of 71 million m3 for a 100,000-ton spill not treated with dispersants, and resulted in exposure of about 2 million Arctic cod larvae remaining from an initial 87 million eggs. This represents the reproductive output of about 7,300 adult females. Adult Arctic cod populations in the Alaska Beaufort number in the 10s to 100s of millions. The results show that even with an order of magnitude variation in exposure, the effect of dispersing a large oil spill on the regional cod population is expected to be insignificant (~0.7%). The recent hiatus in Arctic oil and gas development affords an opportunity to acquire additional data to further strengthen this conclusion. The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author. |
|---|