Improved estimation of age composition by accounting for spatiotemporal variability in somatic growth
Age composition is defined as the proportion of a fish population belonging to each age class and is an informative input to stock assessment models. Variations in somatic growth rates may lead to larger errors in age composition estimates. To reduce this source of error, we compared the performance...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
NRC Research Press (a division of Canadian Science Publishing)
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/102374 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0166 |
| Summary: | Age composition is defined as the proportion of a fish population belonging to each age class and is an informative input to stock assessment models. Variations in somatic growth rates may lead to larger errors in age composition estimates. To reduce this source of error, we compared the performance of four methods for estimating age compositions of a simulated fish population: two methods based on age–length keys (ALK, pooled and annual) and two model-based approaches (generalized additive models (GAMs) and continuation ratio logits (CRLs)). CRL was the most robust and precise method, followed by annual ALKs, particularly when significant growth variability was present. We applied these methods to survey age subsample data for Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) in the eastern Bering Sea, estimating age compositions that were then incorporated in its stock assessment model. The model that included age compositions estimated by CRL displayed the highest consistency with other data in the model. CRL approach has utility for estimating age compositions employed in stock assessment models, especially when substantial variation in somatic growth is present. The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author. |
|---|