Successful conservation - then what? The de-listing of Arctocephalus fur seal species in Antarctica
At the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in Edinburgh in June2006, a proposal to de-list fur seals ( Arctocephalus sp.) from special protectionwas accepted. This is the first time the Antarctic Treaty Parties havesubstantively reviewed their 40-year-old legal regime for special protection...
| Published in: | Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Inc.
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals https://doi.org/10.1080/13880290801960712 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/54442 |
| Summary: | At the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in Edinburgh in June2006, a proposal to de-list fur seals ( Arctocephalus sp.) from special protectionwas accepted. This is the first time the Antarctic Treaty Parties havesubstantively reviewed their 40-year-old legal regime for special protection ofa listed species. Before the Parties could arrive at a decision it was necessaryfor them to design and adopt a procedure for dealing with listing and de-listing.It was also necessary to examine management choices post-de-listing becausefur seals have taken a strong foothold in Antarctic Peninsula ecosystems andtheir niche making has been problematic. The Parties chose a passive approachto future management of fur seals (that is, without a specific action plan formonitoring and reassessment3), based on the belief that the species are not inany immediate danger of reversal of fortune: . . . they [fur seals] would notbe exposed to any potential threat of commercial exploitation in the future asa result of their delisting as Specially Protected Species (emphasis added). |
|---|