Human factor risk assessment during emergency condition in harsh environment

• Published in: Volume 2B: Structures, Safety and Reliability
• Main Authors: Musharraf, M, Khan, FI, Veitch, B, MacKinnon, S, Imtiaz, S
• Format: Conference Object
• Language: English
• Published: American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2013
• Subjects: Engineering; Interdisciplinary Engineering; Risk Engineering (excl. Earthquake Engineering); Arctic
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2013-10867; http://ecite.utas.edu.au/120761

This paper presents a quantitative approach to human factors risk analysis during emergency conditions on an offshore petroleum facility located in a harsh environment. Due to the lack of human factors data for emergency conditions, most of the available human factors risk assessment methodologies are based on expert judgment techniques. Expert judgment is a valuable technique, however, it suffers from vagueness, subjectivity and incompleteness due to a lack of supporting empirical evidence. These weaknesses are often not accounted for in conventional human factors risk assessment. The available approaches also suffer from the unrealistic assumption of independence of the human performance shaping (HPS) factors and actions. The focus of this paper is to address the issue of handling uncertainty associated with expert judgments and to account for the dependency among the HPS factors and actions. These outcomes are achieved by integrating Bayesian Networks with Fuzzy and Evidence theories to estimate human error probabilities during different phases of an emergency. To test the applicability of the approach, results are compared with an analytical approach. The study demonstrates that the proposed approach is effective in assessing human error probability, which in turn improves reliability and auditability of human factors risk assessment. Copyright 2013 by ASME.