Weak spatiotemporal response of prey to predation risk in a freely interacting system

1. The extent to which prey space use actively minimizes predation risk continues to ignite controversy. Methodological reasons that have hindered consensus include inconsistent measurements of predation risk, biased spatiotemporal scales at which responses are measured and lack of robust null expec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Animal Ecology
Main Authors: Cusack, Jeremy J, Kohl, Michel T, Metz, Matthew C, Coulson, Tim, Stahler, Daniel R, Smith, Douglas W, MacNulty, Daniel R
Other Authors: National Park Service, National Science Foundation, Natural Environment Research Council, Biological and Environmental Sciences, Utah State University, University of Montana, University of Oxford, U.S. National Park Service, orcid:0000-0003-3004-1586, orcid:0000-0002-9173-8910
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29228
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12968
http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/29228/1/Cusack_et_al-2020-Journal_of_Animal_Ecology.pdf
Description
Summary:1. The extent to which prey space use actively minimizes predation risk continues to ignite controversy. Methodological reasons that have hindered consensus include inconsistent measurements of predation risk, biased spatiotemporal scales at which responses are measured and lack of robust null expectations. 2. We addressed all three challenges in a comprehensive analysis of the spatiotemporal responses of adult female elk (Cervus elaphus) to the risk of predation by wolves (Canis lupus) during winter in northern Yellowstone, USA. 3. We quantified spatial overlap between the winter home ranges of GPS‐collared elk and three measures of predation risk: the intensity of wolf space use, the distribution of wolf‐killed elk and vegetation openness. We also assessed whether elk varied their use of areas characterized by more or less predation risk across hours of the day, and estimated encounter rates between simultaneous elk and wolf pack trajectories. We determined whether observed values were significantly lower than expected if elk movements were random with reference to predation risk using a null model approach. 4. Although a small proportion of elk did show a tendency to minimize use of open vegetation at specific times of the day, overall we highlight a notable absence of spatiotemporal response by female elk to the risk of predation posed by wolves in northern Yellowstone. 5. Our results suggest that predator–prey interactions may not always result in strong spatiotemporal patterns of avoidance.