Tracing the genetic impact of farmed turbot Scophthalmus maximus on wild populations

The impact of escapees from aquaculture is of general concern for the sustainability of natural resources. Turbot Scophthalmus maximus is a marine flatfish of great commercial value whose land-based aquaculture started approx. 40 yr ago; hence, a low impact of escapees is expected on wild population...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquaculture Environment Interactions
Main Authors: Prado, Fernanda Dotti do, Vera Rodríguez, Manuel, Hermida Prieto, Miguel, Blanco Hortas, Andrés, Bouza Fernández, María Carmen, Maes, Gregory E., Volckaert, Filip A. M., The Aquatrace Consortium, Martínez Portela, Paulino
Other Authors: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Zooloxía, Xenética e Antropoloxía Física
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Inter-Research Science Publisher
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10347/22716
https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00282
Description
Summary:The impact of escapees from aquaculture is of general concern for the sustainability of natural resources. Turbot Scophthalmus maximus is a marine flatfish of great commercial value whose land-based aquaculture started approx. 40 yr ago; hence, a low impact of escapees is expected on wild populations. However, enhancement of wild stocks using farmed turbot has been carried out along the Northeast Atlantic coasts in the last decades. Recently, a broad panel of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers (755 SNPs; 1 SNP Mb−1) has been used to evaluate the genetic structure of turbot throughout its distribution range, constituting the baseline to evaluate the impact of farmed fish in the wild. Two distinct origins were identified for farmed turbot (F_ORI1 and F_ORI2; FST = 0.049), which differentiated from wild populations after 5 generations of selection (average FST = 0.059), and consistent evidence of adaptation to domestication was de - tected. A notable proportion of fish of farmed ancestry was detected in the wild (15.5%), mainly in the North Sea, where restocking activities have taken place, determining genetic introgression in wild populations. Conversely, effects of land-based aquaculture appear negligible. A simulation exercise supported panels of 40 and 80 SNPs to identify fishes of F_ORI1 and F_ORI2 ancestry in the wild, respectively. Application to empirical data showed an assignment success (wild/farmed ancestry) of approx. 95% in comparison with the full SNP dataset. The SNP tools will be useful to monitor turbot of farmed ancestry in the wild, which might represent a risk, considering the lower fitness of farmed individuals The project was funded by the 7th Framework Programme for research (FP7) under ‘Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy — KBBE’, Theme 2: ‘Food, Agriculture and fisheries, and Biotechnologies’ Project identifier: FP7-KBBE-2012-6-singlestage Grant agreement no.: 311920 ‘The development of tools for tracing and evaluating the genetic impact of fish from aquaculture: AquaTrace’ and the ...