Counts of unique females with cubs in the Apennine brown bear population, 2006–2014

Brown bears in the Apennines, central Italy, survive in a precarious conservation status but the reproductive performance of the population has never been formally assessed. Each year, from 2006-2014, we conducted surveys of females with cubs (FWC) to estimate the minimum number of female bears that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TOSONI, Elisabetta, BOITANI, Luigi, MASTRANTONIO, GIANLUCA, Latini, Roberta, CIUCCI, Paolo
Other Authors: Tosoni, Elisabetta, Boitani, Luigi, Mastrantonio, Gianluca, Ciucci, Paolo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: International Association for bear research and management 2017
Subjects:
Capwire
Chao estimator
demography
distance-based criteria
females with cub
FWC count
Italy
small population
Ursus arctos marsicanus
Ursus arctos
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11573/948797
https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-16-00022.1
http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.2192/URSU-D-16-00022.1
Description
Summary:Brown bears in the Apennines, central Italy, survive in a precarious conservation status but the reproductive performance of the population has never been formally assessed. Each year, from 2006-2014, we conducted surveys of females with cubs (FWC) to estimate the minimum number of female bears that reproduced and annual productivity in this bear population. We discriminated unique family groups based on simultaneity of sightings, presence of individually recognizable bears, and ad hoc distance-based rules developed using GPS relocations from 11 adult female bears in our study population. To estimate the true number of FWC from unique counts, we applied two estimators (Chao2, Capwire) known to handle heterogeneity in sighting probabilities relatively well at small sample sizes. Annually, we estimated 1–6 (x ̅ = 3.9 ± 1.5 SD) unique FWC and tallied a minimum of 3–11 (x ̅ = 7.4 ± 3.0 SD) cubs in the population. No temporal trend in FWC was observed and the mean estimate of reproductive females corresponded well with an independent estimate of total population size obtained in 2011. Although we confirmed that the population is still reproductively functional, the low number of reproducing females and their year-to-year fluctuations dramatically underline the precarious status of Apennine bears. We concur with previous authors that counts of unique FWC are an effective means to assess reproductive output in small bear populations, although it is advisable that more in-depth demographic studies complement this technique.

Similar Items