Comparing the horizontal and vertical approaches used to identify foraging areas of two diving marine predators

International audience Accurately locating the foraging areas of diving marine predators is central to understanding their ecology and implementingconservation and management regulations. This study compares horizontal and vertical approaches of identifying seal foragingareas. We analysed GPS locati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Biology
Main Authors: Planque, Yann, Huon, Mathilde, Caurant, Florence, Pinaud, David, Vincent, Cécile
Other Authors: Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé - UMR 7372 (CEBC), La Rochelle Université (ULR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.science/hal-02462298
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3636-8
Description
Summary:International audience Accurately locating the foraging areas of diving marine predators is central to understanding their ecology and implementingconservation and management regulations. This study compares horizontal and vertical approaches of identifying seal foragingareas. We analysed GPS locations and dive data obtained from GPS/GSM tags fitted on eight grey seals (Halichoerusgrypus) and nine harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). In the horizontal dimension, we used the First Passage Time to identifyArea-Restricted Search (ARS) behaviour. In the vertical dimension, we used two dive criteria indicating benthic foragingbehaviour: dive shape and vertical descent speed. The two approaches were spatially compared using the Index of Differencesin Spatial Pattern. We found that the two approaches highlight similar hotspots when pooling all individuals of thesame species. However, the degree of overlap varied considerably at the individual level. Some individuals performed mostof their likely foraging dives (vertical dimension) in areas where they also displayed ARS behaviour (horizontal dimension),while others performed these dives both in and outside ARS zones. We suggest that comparing foraging areas detected fromhorizontal and vertical approaches (1) can strengthen the confidence in the efficiency of approaches to accurately spatializethe actual foraging effort of a diving predator at the scale of a colony (sampled with several individuals); and (2) providesmore comprehensive insights into potential interindividual differences in foraging strategies as some divergent individualstrategies may not be detected using only horizontal movements.