Response to Comment on "Early Archaean Microorganisms Preferred Elemental Sulfur, Not Sulfate"

International audience Our knowledge of the sulfur cycle on early Earth is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, there existenough geochemical constraints from the rock record to show that the theoretical mixing modelsproposed by Bao et al. are highly unlikely to account for the range of d34S and D33S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science
Main Authors: Philippot, P., van Zuilen, M., Lepot, K., Thomazo, C., Farquhar, J., van Kranendonk, M.
Other Authors: Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPG Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP (UMR_7154)), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPG Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), University of Maryland College Park, University of Maryland System, Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA)
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02525845
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151414
Description
Summary:International audience Our knowledge of the sulfur cycle on early Earth is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, there existenough geochemical constraints from the rock record to show that the theoretical mixing modelsproposed by Bao et al. are highly unlikely to account for the range of d34S and D33S valuesrecorded for the microscopic sulfides at the North Pole