Proof of concept testing of an integrated dry injection system for SO sub x /NO sub x control

The objective of the subscale test program were designed to provide sorbent and additive selection guidance, and, in so doing, supply answers to the questions posed in the preceding section. The objectives are: Identify the best commercial hydrate sorbent and the best enhanced hydrate sorbent from a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helfritch, D.J., Bortz, S.J. (Research-Cottrell, Inc., Somerville, NJ (United States). Environmental Services and Technologies Div.), Beittel, R. (Riley Stoker Corp., Worcester, MA (United States))
Other Authors: United States. Department of Energy.
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Research-Cottrell, Inc., Somerville, NJ (United States). Environmental Services and Technologies Div. 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2172/5127392
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1058098/
Description
Summary:The objective of the subscale test program were designed to provide sorbent and additive selection guidance, and, in so doing, supply answers to the questions posed in the preceding section. The objectives are: Identify the best commercial hydrate sorbent and the best enhanced hydrate sorbent from a list of nine types, based upon S0{sub 2} removal at Ca/S=2. Determine the relative effectiveness of sodium sesquicarbonate versus sodium bicarbonate for S0{sub 2} and NO{sub x} control over the temperature range of 200{degrees}F--400{degrees}F. Identify the best NO{sub 2} suppressing additive among the group of ammonia, urea, and activated carbon.