Biogeophysical controls on soil-atmosphere thermal differences: implications on warming Arctic ecosystems

International audience Soil temperature (ST) has a key role in Arctic ecosystem functioning and global environmental change. However, soil thermal conditions do not necessarily follow synoptic temperature variations. This is because local biogeophysical processes can lead to a pronounced soil-atmosp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Aalto, Juha, Scherrer, Daniel, Lenoir, Jonathan, Guisan, Antoine, Luoto, Miska
Other Authors: Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés - UMR CNRS 7058 (EDYSAN), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de Biologie de la Conservation (LBC), Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL), Thule Institute, University of Oulu
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.science/hal-02352630
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac83e
Description
Summary:International audience Soil temperature (ST) has a key role in Arctic ecosystem functioning and global environmental change. However, soil thermal conditions do not necessarily follow synoptic temperature variations. This is because local biogeophysical processes can lead to a pronounced soil-atmosphere thermal offset (∆T) while altering the coupling (βT) between ST and ambient air temperature (AAT). Here, we aim to uncover the spatiotemporal variation in these parameters and identify their main environmental drivers. By deploying a unique network of 322 temperature loggers and surveying biogeophysical processes across an Arctic landscape, we found that the spatial variation in ∆T during the AAT≤0 period (mean ∆T = 6.0 °C, standard deviation ± 1.2 °C) was directly and indirectly constrained by local topography controlling snow depth. By contrast, during the AAT>0 period, ∆T was controlled by soil characteristics, vegetation and solar radiation (∆T = −0.6 °C ± 1.0 °C). Importantly, ∆T was not constant throughout the seasons reflecting the influence of βT on the rate of local soil warming being stronger after (mean βT = 0.8 ± 0.1) than before (βT = 0.2 ± 0.2) snowmelt. Our results highlight the need for continuous microclimatic and local environmental monitoring, and suggest a potential for large buffering and non-uniform warming of snow-dominated Arctic ecosystems under projected temperature increase.