Reply to the comment on “Effects in North Africa of the 934–940 CE Eldgjá and 1783–1784 CE Laki eruptions (Iceland) revealed by previously unrecognized written sources”
In this “reply”, the historical sources about Eldgjá and Laki eruptions commented on by Newfield and Oppenheimer are dealt more thoroughly, pointing out that some of the examined “witness statements” are not as straightforward as one could expect, either concerning the dating of the events recorded...
Published in: | Bulletin of Volcanology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10281/322918 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01479-8 https://rdcu.be/cq7AU |
Summary: | In this “reply”, the historical sources about Eldgjá and Laki eruptions commented on by Newfield and Oppenheimer are dealt more thoroughly, pointing out that some of the examined “witness statements” are not as straightforward as one could expect, either concerning the dating of the events recorded or their description. |
---|