Reply to the comment on “Effects in North Africa of the 934–940 CE Eldgjá and 1783–1784 CE Laki eruptions (Iceland) revealed by previously unrecognized written sources”

In this “reply”, the historical sources about Eldgjá and Laki eruptions commented on by Newfield and Oppenheimer are dealt more thoroughly, pointing out that some of the examined “witness statements” are not as straightforward as one could expect, either concerning the dating of the events recorded...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of Volcanology
Main Authors: Brugnatelli, Vermondo, Tibaldi, Alessandro
Other Authors: Brugnatelli, V, Tibaldi, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10281/322918
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01479-8
https://rdcu.be/cq7AU
Description
Summary:In this “reply”, the historical sources about Eldgjá and Laki eruptions commented on by Newfield and Oppenheimer are dealt more thoroughly, pointing out that some of the examined “witness statements” are not as straightforward as one could expect, either concerning the dating of the events recorded or their description.