Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment

This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eerola, Aleksi, Reuchamps, Min, International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
Other Authors: UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Deliberative democracy
Iceland
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
id ftunivlouvain:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:218610
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlouvain:oai:dial.uclouvain.be:boreal:218610 2024-05-12T08:05:42+00:00 Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment Eerola, Aleksi Reuchamps, Min International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’ UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe 2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610 eng eng boreal:218610 http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Deliberative democracy info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject 2016 ftunivlouvain 2024-04-17T16:48:15Z This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy. Conference Object Iceland DIAL@UCLouvain (Université catholique de Louvain)
institution Open Polar
collection DIAL@UCLouvain (Université catholique de Louvain)
op_collection_id ftunivlouvain
language English
topic Deliberative democracy
spellingShingle Deliberative democracy
Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
topic_facet Deliberative democracy
description This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.
author2 UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe
format Conference Object
author Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
author_facet Eerola, Aleksi
Reuchamps, Min
International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
author_sort Eerola, Aleksi
title Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_short Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_full Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_fullStr Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment
title_sort constitutional modernization and deliberative democracy: a political science assessment
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation boreal:218610
http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1798848050279481344

Similar Items