Constitutional Modernization and Deliberative Democracy: a Political Science Assessment

This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eerola, Aleksi, Reuchamps, Min, International seminar ‘The Contribution of the Constitution to the Protection of human Rights’
Other Authors: UCL - SSH/SPLE - Institut de sciences politiques Louvain-Europe
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Deliberative democracy
Iceland
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/218610
Description
Summary:This article analyses contemporary attempts at constitutional modernisation through deliberative democracy. The cases of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Nepal are assessed through the lens of three different types of legitimacy: input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy, and output legitimacy.

Similar Items