A model-based assessment of observational methods to estimate anthropogenic CO2

Three methods to estimate anthropogenic CO2 in the ocean (deltaC* method, TTD (transit time distribution) method and taking the difference of two DIC equilibrium concentrations), which are widely used in observations, were adapted to a coarse resolution (4/3°) ocean general circulation model of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rohr, Inger
Other Authors: Oschlies, Andreas, Körtzinger, Arne
Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
TTD
Online Access:https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:8-diss-31086
https://macau.uni-kiel.de/receive/diss_mods_00003108
https://macau.uni-kiel.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dissertation_derivate_00002514/rohr_diss_081105.pdf
Description
Summary:Three methods to estimate anthropogenic CO2 in the ocean (deltaC* method, TTD (transit time distribution) method and taking the difference of two DIC equilibrium concentrations), which are widely used in observations, were adapted to a coarse resolution (4/3°) ocean general circulation model of the North Atlantic. This is done for testing the methods and comparing them to anthropogenic CO2 modelled directly in this model. Furthermore two methods for modelling anthropogenic CO2 are compared in a climatological forced model run. Modelling anthropogenic CO2 as a passive tracer with a surface flux containing the information of anthropogenic pCO2 perturbation leads to 15% to 20% lower concentrations than the “true” anthropogenic CO2 of the model. This is computed as the difference of DIC concentrations from a model run with realistically prescribed atmospheric pCO2 concentrations minus a model run with a constant preindustrial atmospheric pCO2 concentration, where in both cases a NPZD (nutrient, phytoplankton, zooplankton, detritus) model is coupled to the physical model. For correcting this underestimation by the passive anthropogenic CO2 tracer an improvement to model this tracer is suggested. Adapting a method which uses an age-spectrum (TTD method) or directly modelled water age (difference of two DIC equilibrium concentrations) of a water patch for estimating anthropogenic CO2, leads to concentrations, which are close to the “true” modelled anthropogenic CO2 concentrations. In contrast to that, estimating anthropogenic CO2 by using a method which needs a single chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) derived water age (deltaC* method), leads to high overestimation of the “true” anthropogenic CO2 of the model, especially in the deep ocean. One assumption of the deltaC* method is that anthropogenic CO2 is transported predominantly along isopycnal surfaces. To test this, a sensitivity model run excluding isopycnal mixing was performed. Especially estimating anthropogenic CO2 with the deltaC* method using the output of this model ...