Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used?
For the past twenty years, several indicator sets have been produced on international, national and regional levels. Most of the work has concentrated on the selection of the indicators and on collection of the pertinent data, but less attention has been given to the actual users and their needs. Th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Environment Institute
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/39328 |
_version_ | 1821873924982439936 |
---|---|
author | Rosenström, Ulla |
author_facet | Rosenström, Ulla |
author_sort | Rosenström, Ulla |
collection | HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository |
description | For the past twenty years, several indicator sets have been produced on international, national and regional levels. Most of the work has concentrated on the selection of the indicators and on collection of the pertinent data, but less attention has been given to the actual users and their needs. This dissertation focuses on the use of sustainable development indicator sets. The dissertation explores the reasons that have deterred the use of the indicators, discusses the role of sustainable development indicators in a policy-cycle and broadens the view of use by recognising three different types of use.The work presents two indicator development processes: The Finnish national sustainable development indicators and the socio-cultural indicators supporting the measurement of eco-efficiency in the Kymenlaakso Region. The sets are compared by using a framework created in this work to describe indicator process quality. It includes five principles supported by more specific criteria. The principles are high policy relevance, sound indicator quality, efficient participation, effective dissemination and long-term institutionalisation.The framework provided a way to identify the key obstacles for use. The two immediate problems with current indicator sets are that the users are unaware of them and the indicators are often unsuitable to their needs. The reasons for these major flaws are irrelevance of the indicators to the policy needs, technical shortcomings in the context and presentation, failure to engage the users in the development process, non-existent dissemination strategies and lack of institutionalisation to promote and update the indicators. The importance of the different obstacles differs among the users and use types.In addition to the indicator projects, materials used in the dissertation include 38 interviews of high-level policy-makers or civil servants close to them, statistics of the national indicator Internet-page downloads, citations of the national indicator publication, and the media coverage of ... |
format | Book |
genre | Boreal Environment Research |
genre_facet | Boreal Environment Research |
id | ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/39328 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivhelsihelda |
op_relation | Monographs of the Boreal Environment Research 33 1796-1661 978-952-11-3414-2 978-952-11-3415-9 Suomen ympäristökeskus http://hdl.handle.net/10138/39328 |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Finnish Environment Institute |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/39328 2025-01-16T21:20:10+00:00 Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? Rosenström, Ulla 2013-05-23T06:14:58Z application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/39328 eng eng Finnish Environment Institute Monographs of the Boreal Environment Research 33 1796-1661 978-952-11-3414-2 978-952-11-3415-9 Suomen ympäristökeskus http://hdl.handle.net/10138/39328 kestävä kehitys indikaattorit käyttö päätöksenteko ympäristöpolitiikka Kirja 2013 ftunivhelsihelda 2023-07-28T06:28:38Z For the past twenty years, several indicator sets have been produced on international, national and regional levels. Most of the work has concentrated on the selection of the indicators and on collection of the pertinent data, but less attention has been given to the actual users and their needs. This dissertation focuses on the use of sustainable development indicator sets. The dissertation explores the reasons that have deterred the use of the indicators, discusses the role of sustainable development indicators in a policy-cycle and broadens the view of use by recognising three different types of use.The work presents two indicator development processes: The Finnish national sustainable development indicators and the socio-cultural indicators supporting the measurement of eco-efficiency in the Kymenlaakso Region. The sets are compared by using a framework created in this work to describe indicator process quality. It includes five principles supported by more specific criteria. The principles are high policy relevance, sound indicator quality, efficient participation, effective dissemination and long-term institutionalisation.The framework provided a way to identify the key obstacles for use. The two immediate problems with current indicator sets are that the users are unaware of them and the indicators are often unsuitable to their needs. The reasons for these major flaws are irrelevance of the indicators to the policy needs, technical shortcomings in the context and presentation, failure to engage the users in the development process, non-existent dissemination strategies and lack of institutionalisation to promote and update the indicators. The importance of the different obstacles differs among the users and use types.In addition to the indicator projects, materials used in the dissertation include 38 interviews of high-level policy-makers or civil servants close to them, statistics of the national indicator Internet-page downloads, citations of the national indicator publication, and the media coverage of ... Book Boreal Environment Research HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository |
spellingShingle | kestävä kehitys indikaattorit käyttö päätöksenteko ympäristöpolitiikka Rosenström, Ulla Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
title | Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
title_full | Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
title_fullStr | Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
title_short | Sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
title_sort | sustainable development indicators : much wanted, less used? |
topic | kestävä kehitys indikaattorit käyttö päätöksenteko ympäristöpolitiikka |
topic_facet | kestävä kehitys indikaattorit käyttö päätöksenteko ympäristöpolitiikka |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/39328 |