On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages

Within the given paper, I investigate the patterns of the linguistic expression of locative predication (formalized as “X BE.AT Y”) in the Samoyedic languages, taking into account the two major typological approaches of Stassen (1997) and Ameka & Levinson (2007). The following patterns are shown...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Däbritz, Chris Lasse
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406
https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5
_version_ 1821503991154999296
author Däbritz, Chris Lasse
author_facet Däbritz, Chris Lasse
author_sort Däbritz, Chris Lasse
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
description Within the given paper, I investigate the patterns of the linguistic expression of locative predication (formalized as “X BE.AT Y”) in the Samoyedic languages, taking into account the two major typological approaches of Stassen (1997) and Ameka & Levinson (2007). The following patterns are shown: The encoding of the theme (unmarked subject) and the location (spatial adverbial included in the predicate) does not differ across the Samoyedic languages, but the linking element: In affirmative locative clauses, most Samoyedic languages exhibit a copula verb, which appears in predicate nominals/adjectives as well. The major exception from this pattern is the Forest Enets locative copula verb ŋa- ‘to be at’, which I discuss in more detail since its locative semantics appear to be a recent functionally motivated development. In negative locative clauses, in turn, negative existential verbs are used in all Samoyedic languages. Consequently, Samoyedic languages show a polarity split in the encoding of locative predication. Arguing that a locative interpretation of the successor forms of the Proto-Samoyedic copula verb is not felicitous from a synchronic point of view, I discuss the typological approaches of Stassen (1997) as well as Ameka & Levinson (2007). Finally, I present a first attempt at typological classification of locative predication, which is based on the analysis of the Samoyedic languages but might be validated by taking into account data from a much larger sample of languages.
format Other/Unknown Material
genre Enets
samojed*
samojed*
samoyed*
genre_facet Enets
samojed*
samojed*
samoyed*
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/342406
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
op_doi https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5
op_relation Hämeenmaalta Jamalille : kirja Tapani Salmiselle 07.04.2022
978-951-51-8085-8
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406
https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5
op_rights CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fi
publishDate 2022
publisher Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/342406 2025-01-16T21:44:01+00:00 On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages Däbritz, Chris Lasse 2022-04-05T07:05:20Z application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 eng eng Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto Hämeenmaalta Jamalille : kirja Tapani Salmiselle 07.04.2022 978-951-51-8085-8 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fi kielitiede samojedikielet kielitypologia linguistics Samoyedic languages linguistic typology Artikkeli kirjassa 2022 ftunivhelsihelda https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 2024-03-27T17:51:44Z Within the given paper, I investigate the patterns of the linguistic expression of locative predication (formalized as “X BE.AT Y”) in the Samoyedic languages, taking into account the two major typological approaches of Stassen (1997) and Ameka & Levinson (2007). The following patterns are shown: The encoding of the theme (unmarked subject) and the location (spatial adverbial included in the predicate) does not differ across the Samoyedic languages, but the linking element: In affirmative locative clauses, most Samoyedic languages exhibit a copula verb, which appears in predicate nominals/adjectives as well. The major exception from this pattern is the Forest Enets locative copula verb ŋa- ‘to be at’, which I discuss in more detail since its locative semantics appear to be a recent functionally motivated development. In negative locative clauses, in turn, negative existential verbs are used in all Samoyedic languages. Consequently, Samoyedic languages show a polarity split in the encoding of locative predication. Arguing that a locative interpretation of the successor forms of the Proto-Samoyedic copula verb is not felicitous from a synchronic point of view, I discuss the typological approaches of Stassen (1997) as well as Ameka & Levinson (2007). Finally, I present a first attempt at typological classification of locative predication, which is based on the analysis of the Samoyedic languages but might be validated by taking into account data from a much larger sample of languages. Other/Unknown Material Enets samojed* samojed* samoyed* HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
spellingShingle kielitiede
samojedikielet
kielitypologia
linguistics
Samoyedic languages
linguistic typology
Däbritz, Chris Lasse
On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
title On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
title_full On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
title_fullStr On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
title_full_unstemmed On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
title_short On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
title_sort on the typology of locative predication in samoyedic languages
topic kielitiede
samojedikielet
kielitypologia
linguistics
Samoyedic languages
linguistic typology
topic_facet kielitiede
samojedikielet
kielitypologia
linguistics
Samoyedic languages
linguistic typology
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406
https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5