On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages
Within the given paper, I investigate the patterns of the linguistic expression of locative predication (formalized as “X BE.AT Y”) in the Samoyedic languages, taking into account the two major typological approaches of Stassen (1997) and Ameka & Levinson (2007). The following patterns are shown...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 |
_version_ | 1821503991154999296 |
---|---|
author | Däbritz, Chris Lasse |
author_facet | Däbritz, Chris Lasse |
author_sort | Däbritz, Chris Lasse |
collection | HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository |
description | Within the given paper, I investigate the patterns of the linguistic expression of locative predication (formalized as “X BE.AT Y”) in the Samoyedic languages, taking into account the two major typological approaches of Stassen (1997) and Ameka & Levinson (2007). The following patterns are shown: The encoding of the theme (unmarked subject) and the location (spatial adverbial included in the predicate) does not differ across the Samoyedic languages, but the linking element: In affirmative locative clauses, most Samoyedic languages exhibit a copula verb, which appears in predicate nominals/adjectives as well. The major exception from this pattern is the Forest Enets locative copula verb ŋa- ‘to be at’, which I discuss in more detail since its locative semantics appear to be a recent functionally motivated development. In negative locative clauses, in turn, negative existential verbs are used in all Samoyedic languages. Consequently, Samoyedic languages show a polarity split in the encoding of locative predication. Arguing that a locative interpretation of the successor forms of the Proto-Samoyedic copula verb is not felicitous from a synchronic point of view, I discuss the typological approaches of Stassen (1997) as well as Ameka & Levinson (2007). Finally, I present a first attempt at typological classification of locative predication, which is based on the analysis of the Samoyedic languages but might be validated by taking into account data from a much larger sample of languages. |
format | Other/Unknown Material |
genre | Enets samojed* samojed* samoyed* |
genre_facet | Enets samojed* samojed* samoyed* |
id | ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/342406 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivhelsihelda |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 |
op_relation | Hämeenmaalta Jamalille : kirja Tapani Salmiselle 07.04.2022 978-951-51-8085-8 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 |
op_rights | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fi |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/342406 2025-01-16T21:44:01+00:00 On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages Däbritz, Chris Lasse 2022-04-05T07:05:20Z application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 eng eng Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto Hämeenmaalta Jamalille : kirja Tapani Salmiselle 07.04.2022 978-951-51-8085-8 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.fi kielitiede samojedikielet kielitypologia linguistics Samoyedic languages linguistic typology Artikkeli kirjassa 2022 ftunivhelsihelda https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 2024-03-27T17:51:44Z Within the given paper, I investigate the patterns of the linguistic expression of locative predication (formalized as “X BE.AT Y”) in the Samoyedic languages, taking into account the two major typological approaches of Stassen (1997) and Ameka & Levinson (2007). The following patterns are shown: The encoding of the theme (unmarked subject) and the location (spatial adverbial included in the predicate) does not differ across the Samoyedic languages, but the linking element: In affirmative locative clauses, most Samoyedic languages exhibit a copula verb, which appears in predicate nominals/adjectives as well. The major exception from this pattern is the Forest Enets locative copula verb ŋa- ‘to be at’, which I discuss in more detail since its locative semantics appear to be a recent functionally motivated development. In negative locative clauses, in turn, negative existential verbs are used in all Samoyedic languages. Consequently, Samoyedic languages show a polarity split in the encoding of locative predication. Arguing that a locative interpretation of the successor forms of the Proto-Samoyedic copula verb is not felicitous from a synchronic point of view, I discuss the typological approaches of Stassen (1997) as well as Ameka & Levinson (2007). Finally, I present a first attempt at typological classification of locative predication, which is based on the analysis of the Samoyedic languages but might be validated by taking into account data from a much larger sample of languages. Other/Unknown Material Enets samojed* samojed* samoyed* HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository |
spellingShingle | kielitiede samojedikielet kielitypologia linguistics Samoyedic languages linguistic typology Däbritz, Chris Lasse On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages |
title | On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages |
title_full | On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages |
title_fullStr | On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages |
title_full_unstemmed | On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages |
title_short | On the typology of locative predication in Samoyedic languages |
title_sort | on the typology of locative predication in samoyedic languages |
topic | kielitiede samojedikielet kielitypologia linguistics Samoyedic languages linguistic typology |
topic_facet | kielitiede samojedikielet kielitypologia linguistics Samoyedic languages linguistic typology |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/342406 https://doi.org/10.31885/9789515180858.5 |