Focus feature percolation: Evidence from Tundra Nenets and Tundra Yukaghir
Two Siberian languages, Tundra Nenets and Tundra Yukaghir, do not obey strong island constraints in questioning: any sub-constituent of a relative or adverbial clause can be questioned. We argue that this has to do with how focusing works in these languages. The focused sub-constituent remains in si...
| Published in: | Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Conference Object |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/72355 https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-723552 https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2014.16 http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/files/72355/hpsg2014-matic-nikolaeva.pdf |
| Summary: | Two Siberian languages, Tundra Nenets and Tundra Yukaghir, do not obey strong island constraints in questioning: any sub-constituent of a relative or adverbial clause can be questioned. We argue that this has to do with how focusing works in these languages. The focused sub-constituent remains in situ, but there is abundant morphosyntactic evidence that the focus feature is passed up to the head of the clause. The result is the formation of a complex focus structure in which both the head and non head daughter are overtly marked as focus, and they are interpreted as a pairwise list such that the focus background is applicable to this list, but not to other alternative lists. |
|---|